Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.26 seconds)Section 27 in The Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 [Entire Act]
Section 31 in The Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 [Entire Act]
Section 32 in The Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 [Entire Act]
Jayminbhai Navinbhai Doshi vs State Of Gujarat & on 5 September, 2014
11.1 However the said decision cannot be read and
construed to derive or usurp the power to restrict
rather artificially curtail - the time limit allowed by
the Act for filing revision application under section
53.
11.2 If the said provision is construed in the manner
adopted by the authority, then it will frustrate the
object of the Act and the intention of the legislature.
Section 39 in The Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 [Entire Act]
Section 40 in The Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 [Entire Act]
Section 32A in The Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 [Entire Act]
Devang Shaileshbhai vs State Of Gujarat & 2 on 25 September, 2014
"6. Coming back to the facts of the present case and
the relevant dates, which are already noted in
paragraph 5 above, the Deputy Collector passed order on
27.06.2014 which was actually dispatched to the
petitioner on 30.06.2014 and the petitioner received
the order on 02.07.2014. The date of receipt of the
order is the date of the knowledge. The limitation
period of 90 days for the purpose of Section 53(1) of
the Act is required to be calculated from the date of
knowledge of the order, that is, from 02.07.2014. The
ratio of decision in Ritaben Kamleshbhai Mehta (supra)
squarely applies. The view taken by the Appellate
Authority in his order dated 22.01.2015 that the appeal
of the petitioner was beyond the period of limitation
is evidently erroneous. The same fails to sustain."
Yatin Natvarlal Bhatt vs Chief Controlling Revenue Authority & 2 on 15 June, 2015
5.6 The ratio of the above decision was followed
in Yatin Natwarlal Bhatt Vs Chief Controlling Revenue
Authorities and others being Special Civil
Application No.6352 of 2015 decided on 28th July, 2015
wherein the facts akin to the present one were
obtained as recorded in paragraph 6 of the said
decision.
1