Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 19 (0.26 seconds)The Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950
Section 100 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 144 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 6 in The Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
Section 8 in The Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
Suraj Bhan & Ors vs Financial Commissioner & Ors on 16 April, 2007
16. After going through the aforesaid Rules, this Court has no
hesitation in holding that essentially the purpose of issuance of
preparation of rent in Form-M is for revenue collection. It is a settled
principle of law that documents prepared for revenue collection can at
best indicate the possession of a party over the land in question but
certainly this cannot confer or extinguish any title of the parties, as has
been held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Suraj
Bhan v. Financial Commr., (2007) 6 SCC 186 which reads as under:
Jattu Ram vs Hakam Singh And Others on 15 September, 1993
Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx It is well settled that an entry in revenue records
does not confer title on a person whose name appears in record-of-rights.
It is settled law that entries in the revenue records or jamabandi have
only "fiscal purpose" i.e. payment of land revenue, and no ownership is
conferred on the basis of such entries. So far as title to the property is
concerned, it can only be decided by a competent civil court (vide Jattu
Ram v. Hakam Singh).Xxxxxxxxxxx.