Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.61 seconds)
The Indian Section The Theosophical ... vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 3 September, 2019 cites

State Of U.P. & Ors vs Lalji Tandon (Dead) on 3 November, 2003

13. Learned Senior Counsel has relied upon a judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of State of U.P. and others vs. Lalji Tandon through LRs. reported at (2004) 1 SCC 1 in order to suggest that renewal of lease cannot be stalled on the account of alleged breach of conditions and for cancelling the lease, separate inquiry has to be conducted.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 124 - R C Lahoti - Full Document

Justice P.D. Dinakaran vs Hon'Ble Judges Inquiry Committee & Ors on 5 July, 2011

14. Learned Senior Counsel further relied upon the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in the matter of P.D. Dinakaran (1) vs. Judges Inquiry Committee reported at (2011) 8 SCC 380 to impress upon the court that principles of natural justice has to be adhered to secure justice and to prevent miscarriage of justice. The relevant part of the said judgment is reproduced hereinafter :-
Supreme Court of India Cites 57 - Cited by 57 - G S Singhvi - Full Document

D.D.A vs M/S.Anant Raj Agencies Pvt.Ltd on 12 April, 2016

16. Learned Standing Counsel further relied upon Section 20(6) (C) of the U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973 in order to show that once the petitioner - society has been declared as encroacher, there is no need to even issue notice for eviction proceedings. Learned counsel has relied upon paragraph 32 of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in the matter of Delhi Development Authority vs. Anant Raj Agencies Pvt. Ltd. reported in 2016 (11) SCC 406 wherein, inter alia, it has been held as follows :-
Supreme Court of India Cites 24 - Cited by 44 - V G Gowda - Full Document

M/S Dharampal Satyapal Ltd vs Deputy Commissioner Of Central Excise & ... on 1 December, 2011

"On this approach, the value of legal procedures is judged according to their contribution to general social goals. The object is to advance certain social goals, whether through administrative processes, or through the civil or criminal trial. The law and its processes are simply instruments for achieving some social good as determined from time to time by the law makers of the society. Each case is an instance in achieving the general goal, and a mistaken decision, whether to the benefit or the detriment of a particular person, is simply a failure to achieve the general good in that case. At this level of understanding, judgments of fairness have no place, for all that matters is whether the social good, as expressed through laws, is effectively achieved." Galligan also takes the idea of fair treatment to a second level of understanding, namely, pursuit of common good involves the distribution of benefits and burdens, advantages and disadvantages to individuals (or groups). According to him, principles of justice are the subject matter of fair treatment. However, that aspect need not be dilated.
Gauhati High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 229 - U Bhuyan - Full Document

Mrs. Maneka Gandhi vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Anr. on 25 January, 1978

In the case of Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India & Anr. also the application of principle of natural justice was extended to the administrative action of the State and its authorities. It is, thus, clear that before taking an action, service of notice and giving of hearing to the noticee is required. In Maharashtra State Financial Corporation v. M/s. Suvarna Board Mills & Anr., this aspect was explained in the following manner:
Supreme Court of India Cites 126 - Cited by 1969 - M H Beg - Full Document
1