Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 15 (0.37 seconds)N.C. Daga vs Inder Mohan Singh Rana on 5 December, 2002
Another Coordinate Bench of this Court in
Mange Ram v. Rajesh Narain Goel, in RC. REV. no. 147/2021, decided
on 19.03.2024 after following N.C. Daga v. Inder Mohan Singh Rana
and Vinod Kumar Verma v. Manmohan Verma, in Civil Appeal nos.
Vinod Kumar Verma vs Manmohan Verma & Anr on 19 August, 2008
Another Coordinate Bench of this Court in
Mange Ram v. Rajesh Narain Goel, in RC. REV. no. 147/2021, decided
on 19.03.2024 after following N.C. Daga v. Inder Mohan Singh Rana
and Vinod Kumar Verma v. Manmohan Verma, in Civil Appeal nos.
Smt Poonam Bangia vs Harbhagwan Dass Chandiramani on 22 July, 2021
5220 -5221/2008 passed by the Supreme Court and in Poonam Bangia
v. Harbhagwan Dass Chandiramani in RC. REV no. 16/2021 passed by
this Court as mentioned hereinabove also dismissed the revision
petition as became infructuous due to the reason that the possession
of the subject premises has been restored to the respondent/landlord.
Ram Avtar vs Smt Anuradha Shukla on 29 May, 2023
The relevant extract of Ram Avtar case reads as follows:
Section 14B in The Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 [Entire Act]
Section 25B in The Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 [Entire Act]
Abid-Ul-Islam vs Inder Sain Dua on 7 April, 2022
12.1 The Supreme Court in Abid-Ul-Islam v. Inder Sain Dua6 has held
that Section 19 of the Act gives a right of re-possession to the dispossessed
tenant if landlord recovers possession under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act and
thereafter, the landlord does not use the subject premises for the purpose that
it was intended and set out in such Eviction Petition, on which basis, an
order for eviction was obtained by the landlord. The relevant extract is set
out below: