Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.21 seconds)Section 3 in The Maharashtra Prevention Of Dangerous Activities Of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug-Offenders, Dangerous Persons And Video Pirates Act, 1981 [Entire Act]
Section 41 in The Maharashtra Prohibition Act [Entire Act]
Section 3 in The Maharashtra Prohibition Act [Entire Act]
Mahendra Balaram Tupkar And Ors vs State Of Maharashtra Through The ... on 30 April, 2019
[Criminal Writ Petition No.587/2023],
v] Sanjay S/o. Balaram Kirale Vs. State of Maharashtra &
Anr. [2001 ALL MR (Cri) 1616],
vi] Ramesh Tarachand Rathod Vs. The State of Maharashtra
and Anr. [Criminal Writ Petition No.90/2024],
vii] Ashokrao s/o. Uttamrao Pawar Vs. State of Maharashtra
and Ors. [Criminal Writ Petition No.738/2022],
5 crwp.36.24-J.odt
Satender Kumar Antil vs Central Bureau Of Investigation on 11 July, 2022
13. Section 41 A of Cr. P.C. mandatorily provides that a person must be
served with notice by the police prior to his arrest for the offences punishable with
imprisonment for less than seven years and Section specifies the procedure to be
followed before a person can be deprived of his liberty. Therefore, as per the
guidelines given by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Arnesh Kumar..Vs.. State of Bihar
and anr. reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273 and Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central
Bureau of Investigation and anr. reported in (2021) 10 SCC 773, notice under
Section 41(1)(a) was issued as the punishment for the offence punishable under
Section 65(e) is three years therefore, there is no question of arresting the
6 crwp.36.24-J.odt
accused. There is provision made in Section 41-A of the Code of Criminal
Procedure which empowers the Investigating Officer to arrest a person who has
not been detained under Section 41-A (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. All
this required for effecting an arrest in exercise of these powers, is to record
reasons.
Shamlal Jaglal Jaiswal vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 6 May, 1997
i] Shri. Vidyadhar H. Varma Vs. Shri. R. H. Mendonca & Ors
[2000 ALL MR (Cri) 773],
ii] Rajkumar @ Anda s/o. Jaglal Jaiswal Vs. State of
Maharashtra & Ors. [2017 ALL MR (Cri) 4791],
iii] Shahnawaj Khan s/o. Ismail Khan Vs. The State of
Maharashtra & Anr. [2014 All MR (Cri) 940],
iv] Jakir @ Jakira Hussain Vs. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Mohammad Hanif Ismail Khan Ajmeri And ... vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 20 September, 2016
i] Shri. Vidyadhar H. Varma Vs. Shri. R. H. Mendonca & Ors
[2000 ALL MR (Cri) 773],
ii] Rajkumar @ Anda s/o. Jaglal Jaiswal Vs. State of
Maharashtra & Ors. [2017 ALL MR (Cri) 4791],
iii] Shahnawaj Khan s/o. Ismail Khan Vs. The State of
Maharashtra & Anr. [2014 All MR (Cri) 940],
iv] Jakir @ Jakira Hussain Vs. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Shaikh Jakir Hussain Abdul Sattar vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 3 October, 2019
i] Shri. Vidyadhar H. Varma Vs. Shri. R. H. Mendonca & Ors
[2000 ALL MR (Cri) 773],
ii] Rajkumar @ Anda s/o. Jaglal Jaiswal Vs. State of
Maharashtra & Ors. [2017 ALL MR (Cri) 4791],
iii] Shahnawaj Khan s/o. Ismail Khan Vs. The State of
Maharashtra & Anr. [2014 All MR (Cri) 940],
iv] Jakir @ Jakira Hussain Vs. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
1