Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 28 (0.53 seconds)Section 145U in The Gujarat Co-Operative Societies Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
The Co-Operative Societies Act, 1912
Election Commission Of India Through ... vs Ashok Kumar & Ors on 30 August, 2000
Decision of the Apex Court in Election
Commission of India v. Ashok Kumar [(2000) 8 SCC 216]
and certain other decisions of this Court were
pressed into service to contend that it was
permissible for the Court to grant relief in the
middle of the election process. It was submitted that
the facts and circumstances of this case offer a
valid ground for exercising the writ jurisdiction.
Pawan Kumar vs State Of Haryana And Anr on 7 May, 1996
In Pawan Kumar (supra)
it was held that conviction of the appellant under
Section 294, IPC per se would not establish moral
turpitude unless the tests in that regard laid down
in the policy decision of Haryana Government were
satisfied. In other mentioned judgment it was
observed that the acts disclosing depravity and
wickedness of character can be characterised as
offence involving moral turpitude. It was stated that
the factors to be considered while inferring moral
Page 7 of 19
Downloaded on : Fri Jan 14 02:12:45 IST 2022
C/LPA/68/2021 CAV JUDGMENT
turpitude are-person committing offence, against whom
committed, manner and circumstances in which it is
alleged to have been committed and values of society.
The State Bank Of India And Ors. vs P. Soupramaniane on 26 April, 2019
4.5 Decisions in Pawan Kumar v. State of Haryana
[(1996) 4 SCC 17] and in State Bank of India v. P.
Soupramaniane [(2019) 18 SCC 135] were referred to
seeking to convey as to what is the meaning and
"concept of moral turpitude".
Babaji Kondaji Garad Etc vs The Nasik Merchants Co-Operative Bank ... on 31 October, 1983
4.8 On the basis of decision in Babaji Kondaji
Garad v. Nasik Merchants Co-operative Bank [(1984) 2
SCC 50] it was submitted on behalf of the respondents
that the bye-laws framed by the Co-operative Bank
cannot be held to be law or to have force of law and
that they do not have statutory character. It was
submitted that when they stand in conflict of
legislative enactment, they would be ultra vires.
Rajkot District Co-Operative Bank vs State Of Gujarat & Others on 30 September, 2015
On
the basis of Rajkot District Co-operative Bank v.
State of Gujarat [(2015) 13 SCC 401] it was submitted
that when the bye-law is not amended in accordance
with the statutory rule, the same would not come in
way of the operation of the Rule.
Vitthodar Vividh Karyakari Seva ... vs State Of Gujarat & 4 on 4 October, 2016
6.1 In Vitthodar Vividh Karyakari Seva Sahakari
Mandli (supra) relied on by the respondents in the
context of Section 145U of the Gujarat Co-operative
Societies Act read with Rule 128 of the Gujarat
Agricultural Produce Markets Rules, 1965, this Court
enunciated the law on the issue to observe that
though the petition under Article 226 of the
Constitution is maintainable, the powers are to be
exercised only in extra-ordinary or special
circumstances such as where the order is ultra vires
or nullity or ex facie without jurisdiction.
Mehsana Taluka Co-Operative Purchase ... vs The Director on 15 November, 2016
... ... " (Para 15)
6.5 In Mehsana Taluka Co-operative Purchase &
Sales Union (supra), following were the observations
Page 17 of 19
Downloaded on : Fri Jan 14 02:12:45 IST 2022
C/LPA/68/2021 CAV JUDGMENT
made.