Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.84 seconds)

Sonia And Anr vs State Of U.T. Chandigarh And Others on 10 June, 2019

He submits that for deciding the custody of the child, the present petition for issuance of writ in the nature of habeas corpus, in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, is even not maintainable. He has submitted that paramount consideration is the welfare of the child and keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, welfare of the child does not lie in the custody of the mother. He, thus, submits that neither the present petition is maintainable nor welfare of the child lies in the custody of the petitioner. He has relied upon the judgments in Nirmala vs. Kulwant Singh and others, 2024 AIR (Supreme Court) 2344; Silky Sharma vs. State of Punjab and others, in CRWP-8029-2024 decided on 08.05.2025 and Sonia vs. State of U.T. Chandigarh and others, Law Finder Doc Id # 2160673.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next