Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited vs Datar Switchgear Ltd. And Maharashtra ... on 27 August, 2018
Author: G.S. Patel
Bench: G.S. Patel
16-CHSCD ... Ltd ...Applicant
In the matter between
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd ...Plaintif
Versus
Ridge Innovation Private Limited ...Defendant
And
Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution ...Garnishee
Company Ltd
this regard is well settled.
17. In Datar Switchgears Ltd. Vs. Tata Finance Ltd. & Anr.6 in
interpreting sub- section 6 of Section ... decision in Datar Switchgears Ltd.(supra) and also followed the decision
in Punj Lloyd Ltd. Vs. Petronet MHB Ltd
CHSCDL1413-18.DOC
of the Applicant, Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd ("KML"). It will be
filed in the Registry after correct continuous pagination ... Award Holder Tata Finance Limited ("Tata Finance")
and Datar Switchgear Limited ("Datar Switchgear") or its
successors in title
Mahindra Bank Ltd ...Applicant
In the matter between
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd ...Plaintif
Versus
Ridge Innovation Pvt Ltd ...Defendant
And
Bhalchandra V Datar ... said to be its directors and formerly promoter-directors of Datar
Switchgear Limited ("Datar Switchgear").
2. The application is based
Reliance Media Works Ltd vs B.R. Films on 11 July, 2018
Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE
2018 02:52:07 :::
ppn 5 carap-121.18(j).doc
Environment (Deonar) Ltd. Vs. The Municipal Corporation of Gr.
Mumbai in Arbitration Application ... case of Datar Switchgears Ltd. Vs. Tata
Finance Ltd. , (2000) 8 SCC 151 and in the case of Deep Trading
Company Vs. Indian
Sicom Ltd vs Dsl Enterprises Pvt. Ltd on 27 August, 2018
Author: K.R.Shriram
Bench: K.R.Shriram
1/3 23.cp.486.2000 ... Petitioner claims that it had initially filed this petition against Datar
Switchgear Limited (DSGL) on the ground that DSGL is indebted to
petitioner
Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited vs Ridge Innovation Pvt. Ltd. And Rajan ... on 12 October, 2018
Before : Aniruddha M. Chandekar
Prothonotary & Senior Master
Date : 12th ... want to add
) proposed Defendants i.e. Promoter
) Director of Datar Switchgear Pvt. Ltd.
) and present Defendants have nothing to
) do with proposed Defendants