order passed by Employees Provident Fund Appellate
Tribunal (for short "EPFAT") dated 17.10.2012 (Annexure P/18).
2. 2nd respondent - company was established ... damages is concerned,
2nd respondent-company filed an appeal before the EPFAT and appeal was
dismissed on 17.08.2011. Consequently, 2nd respondent - company filed
rectification application
passed by the Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal (for
short 'EPFAT') in appeal being ATA No.94(4)2011, which in turn ... establishment carried the order dated 07.12.2010 in appeal before
the EPFAT, inter alia, on the basis of their assertion that they had deposited
the provident
order
of the Employees' Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal (for short 'EPFAT')
dated 09.10.2015 (Annexure P-1).
2. Petitioner-Institute is covered under ... before EPFAT. EPFAT passed interim order directing the petitioner to
deposit 40% of the determined amount with the Tribunal within 30 days of
the order
order
of the Employees' Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal (for short 'EPFAT')
dated 09.10.2015 (Annexure P-1).
2. Petitioner-Institute is covered under ... before EPFAT. EPFAT passed interim order directing the petitioner to
deposit 40% of the determined amount with the Tribunal within 30 days of
the order
Employees
Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (for short 'EPFAT').
Respondent-M/s Hari Darshan Singh BKO (Brick Kiln Owner) was issued ... furnishing 7-A proceedings respondent proceeded
to file appeal before the EPFAT in the month of August, 2010. Appeal was
decided on 12.05.2014. EPFAT
order
of the Employees' Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal (for short 'EPFAT')
dated 07.08.2015 (Annexure P-1).
2. Petitioner-Institute is covered under ... before EPFAT. EPFAT passed interim order directing the petitioner to
deposit 50% of the determined amount with the Tribunal within 30 days of
the order
Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal
(hereinafter referred to as "the EPFAT").
2. Vide order dated 12th December, 2012, the EPFAT, exercising
powers under ... application, seeking "review" of the
said order, before the EPFAT itself, purportedly under Section 7-L (2)
of the Act.
4. Section
Waryam Singh Hospital vs Presiding Officer, Epfat, New Delhi on 18 January, 2018
Author: P.B. Bajanthri
Bench: P.B. Bajanthri
IN THE HIGH COURT
filed in Employees' Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal (EPFAT), New
Delhi. He specifically sought for information regarding status of ATA and next
hearing date; whether ... received on 12.09.2017 and the
concerned Nodal Officer forwarded to the CPIO, EPFAT on 13.09.2017. The first
appeal was received on 25.10.2017 and the same
passed by the Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal
(for short 'EPFAT') vide Annexure P23. Petitioner is in the establishment of
shoe business. Respondent ... meanwhilie
petitioner has challenged 7A[1(a)] proceedings before the EPFAT appeal in
which it is prayed as under:-
"The order No. PN/PBCH
