which the Employees'
Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter 'EPFAT') has allowed an
application filed by the Respondent/APFC (hereinafter 'APFC ... impugned order the EPFAT has recalled its earlier order dated 13th April,
2016 by which the appeal of the Petitioner had stood finally allowed
Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous
Signature Not Verified
Digitally signed by
1 “EPFAT”
Chetan Kumar
Date: 2021.03.27
12:25:55 IST
Reason:
CA 1053/2021 ... Delhi High Court was on account of the fact that the
EPFAT was situated in Delhi. Thus, the dismissal of the writ petition was
upheld
learned Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal at New
Delhi (for short - 'EPFAT'). Learned EPFAT vide order dated 16.08.2016
(Annexure P4), observed that ... learned Central Government
Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court-II, Chandigarh. Initially, learned
EPFAT vide order dated 28.06.2019 directed that no coercive steps be taken
against
DEVANSHU
JOSHI
Signing Date:17.12.2021 13:23:15
Tribunal (hereinafter "EPFAT") in respect of the applicability of the
Employees Provident Fund & Miscellaneous ... 5497/2016 challenges the order passed by the EPFAT dated
18th April, 2016 in ATA No.07(16) 2013 titled M/s Dina Nath Public
Appellant has filed one application under
Rule 21 of the EPFAT Rules 1997 seeking
extension of time in complying with order
dated 18.01.2021 through email
next contends that during the relevant period, Employees
Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal (EPFAT) merged with CGIT, vide
Notification dated 23.06.2017 and the files were being ... between the Petitioner and
the counsel. Merger of the CGIT and the EPFAT followed by the shifting
of the CGIT on two occasions is also
within 30 days from today as required
under rule 12 of the EPFAT (procedure) Rules.
Notice is accepted by Sh. Amit Tyagi Advocate
Annexure-A until the competent authority
i.e. Ld. CGIT and EPFAT Ahmedabad hears
and decides the appeal and injunction of the
petitioner company
Annexure-A until the competent authority
i.e. Ld. CGIT and EPFAT Ahmedabad hears
and decides the appeal and injunction of the
petitioner company
shall ensure that all the relevant records from the
records of the EPFAT are filed before this Court in order to enable this
Court
