Hari Ram vs Jyoti Prasad & Anr on 27 January, 2011
appellant/defendant from the time of
possession of his plot had evil eye on the aforesaid disputed
street and the defendant
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 66 (0.92 seconds)R.Thamaraiselvan vs Government Of Tamil Nadu on 28 July, 2011
well be exercised by the State government capriciously or with an evil eye and an unequal hand so as to deliberately bring about invidious discrimination
R.Thamaraiselvan vs Government Of Tamil Nadu on 28 July, 2011
well be exercised by the State government capriciously or with an evil eye and an unequal hand so as to deliberately bring about invidious discrimination
R.Thamaraiselvan vs Government Of Tamil Nadu on 28 July, 2011
well be exercised by the State government capriciously or with an evil eye and an unequal hand so as to deliberately bring about invidious discrimination
Jeeta Ram vs Sunita Devi And Others on 12 December, 2011
student of Government Primary School. Brothers of
the complainant have an evil eye on her property. The complaint is
made at their instance, so that
State vs Ashok Bahl S/O Sh Vikramjit Bahl on 15 March, 2011
further accused no. 1 being a property dealer had an evil
eye on the property of the complainant located in Delhi. The
complainant
Case Of Sharad Birdhichand Sarda vs State Of Maharashtra, on 23 March, 2011
come their house. She has further deposed that Bajrangi
had an evil eye on her and she had made complaint to her husband in
this ... Rekha has admitted that coaccused Bajrangi had an evil eye
on her and she had made a complaint to her husband in this regard
State vs . on 15 November, 2011
accused had a quarrel
with Ms. Nirmala and had an evil eye over her and initially they did
not know as to who the miscreant ... teased her and that he was having
an evil eye on her and when she resisted, the accused had threatened
her of dire consequences
State vs . Sumit, on 18 February, 2011
woman and condemn each such person who
casts an evil eye upon any woman, be she his wife or any other
relation. We must also
State vs . on 20 April, 2011
complainant. It has also been mentioned that the complainant had evil
eyes on the property of their parents and since his sister (wife of
accused