Baby Viyana Berwal vs Khadi & Village Industries Commission on 27 January, 2025
Trade Marks
under various classes is to prevent others from registering the said word marks
"KHADI" or its formative marks "Khadi India
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 1427 (1.11 seconds)Naresh Kadyan vs Khadi & Village Industries Commission on 29 January, 2025
Trade Marks under various classes is
to prevent others from registering the said word mark "KHADI" or
its formative marks "Khadi India ... Trade Marks under various classes is
to prevent others from registering the said word mark "KHADI" or
its formative marks "Khadi India
Shri.M B Rao vs Employees Provident Fund Organisation on 13 May, 2013
There are 6 signatures in the noting sheet. The signatures are marked as A, B, C, D, E, F.
Please inform the name and designation ... EPFO officials who have signed this noting
sheet, in the below format:
Marked as--- Name of the EPFO official. Designation of the official
Rohit Shokeen vs University Of Delhi on 18 June, 2021
Application, he contested that instead of providing the actual marks obtained
by him, the CPIO only intimated the percentage, which is not even correct ... information
provided to the Appellant is as per the format of marking followed by the
outsourced agency. Further, in response to points
Jatinder Singh vs National Institute Of Open Schooling on 30 March, 2022
available at Regional Centre.
2) Not available, attendance of Formative assessment for academic year 2019-20
session March, 2020 Public Examination (Stream 1 Block ... candidates who attended
the 5 five compulsory PCP sessions (for formative) were marked within stipulated
me.
5) Not available at Regional Centre."
Being dissatisfied
Mr.Anil Kumar Mahato vs Delhi Metro Rail Corporation on 27 August, 2013
under the RTI Act , seeking information
regarding the marks obtained by certain candidates in a particular format and certified
copies of the answer sheets. CPIO ... stated that the respondent did not provide the details of marks in the format
created by him. Appellant stated that he was entitled
Mr.D Patel vs Ministry Of Human Resource Development on 30 August, 2013
voluminous and not available at one place. A copy of the format
for marks distribution during interview was provided.
3. An appeal was filed
Mr.Anil Kumar vs Ministry Of Labour And Employment on 14 February, 2013
selected candidates for the post of LDC alongwith their marks obtained in formatting,
conducted in various regions of ESIC within 2010-11 the same ... more than the cut off marks.
(iii) List of selected candidates in each region along with marks in formatting part.
She stated that information under
Jatinder Singh vs National Institute Of Open Schooling on 28 November, 2022
formative
assessment was not done so only summative marks were taken therefore the
marks of formative assessment is not available. Further, a copy ... same has been
Page 3 of 5
CIC/NIOPS/A/2021/638735
marked to the Commission wherein the Appellant has been apprised as
under:
Decision
Mr.Surya Prakash Sharma vs Employees State Insurance Corporation on 24 May, 2013
What was the mark obtained by Roll no. 23011049 in written examination held on
03/07/2011?
2- What was the mark obtained by Roll ... written and computer test.
7- List of candidates in the format mentioning Marks obtained in written and computer
examination with roll number.
Grounds