Corrigendum was issued on 13.10.2003
for removing restriction of pay under FR-35 as per the
2002 Rules.
7. Subsequently, Rajabhasha Adhikari Recruitment
Rules ... corrigendum dated 13.10.2003 was issued removing the
“restriction of pay under FR-35” given in the memos of
local officiating promotion with effect from
regular basis, whichever
was earlier, pay to be regulated under FR-35, with no claim for
regularization or seniority etc in the CE (Civil) grade ... clearly shows that the pay was fixed
under FR-22-1(a) and not under FR-35, as required under
the specific condition incorporated
respondent
would be regulated in terms of FR-35 and FR-49 till the time the regular
pay scale to the post of director ... error in concluding that "re-fixation of their pay under FR-35
cannot be accepted as such re-fixation of pay cannot be done
intimated that the pay
and allowances of the opposite party under FR-35 shall be
restricted in a manner so that the increase ... Posts even though the same has been
restricted under FR 35. As per Rule FR-35 the opposite party
is in level
RESPONDENT
1. NEETHIN THOMAS, AGED 33 YEARS, THOTTATHIL HOUSE, KKRA-35, FR. GEORGE
VAKAYIL ROAD, MARADU, COCHIN, PIN - 682304.
2. T P THOMAS, AGED ... YEARS, THOTTATHIL HOUSE, KKRA-35, FR. GEORGE
VAKAYIL ROAD, MARADU, COCHIN, PIN - 682304.
3. DAISAMMA THOMAS, AGED 63 YEARS, THOTTATHIL HOUSE, KKRA-35, FR.
GEORGE
RESPONDENT
1. NEETHIN THOMAS, AGED 33 YEARS, THOTTATHIL HOUSE, KKRA-35, FR. GEORGE
VAKAYIL ROAD, MARADU, COCHIN, PIN - 682304.
2. T P THOMAS, AGED ... YEARS, THOTTATHIL HOUSE, KKRA-35, FR. GEORGE
VAKAYIL ROAD, MARADU, COCHIN, PIN - 682304.
3. DAISAMMA THOMAS, AGED 63 YEARS, THOTTATHIL HOUSE, KKRA-35, FR.
GEORGE
officiating promotion as per provision of.
FR-35 and the officlatang period in which
the minimum omy in the promoted scale was
3 A meee ... fixed under FR-S2 (1) a (1)
and FR-35 during officiating period and
2
increment was allowed
post of Assistant on local officiating basis with the restriction of FR-35. Out of these 23 officials, 3 officials, viz. Shri V.S. Raghavan ... competent authority has been accorded for revocation of the provision of FR-35 in respect of these three officials. Due to the revocation
instructions on how the restriction of
officiating pay under FR-35 should be implemented from 1989 in terms of
Fundamental (3 -Amendment) Rules ... issued by DOP&T
regarding restriction of officiating pay under FR-35 w.ef. 01.07.2017.
Further, the appellant again raised the issue vide application
present case at hand, as noted above, the relevant Rule is FR-49 which concerns regarding combination of appointment and his pay was restricted ... lower post of Superintendent as permissible under the provisions of FR-35 and this fact of restricting the pay of the lower post is generally
