first respondent, had filed a Interpleader Suit
No.1011/2011 against the petitioner (defendant No.1) and the
second respondent (defendant ... original plaintiff and
the defendant No.2 in the Interpleader Suit. Thus, no case for
interference is made out. The petition is without any merit
correct
answer is option (c) which is to institute an Interpleader Suit
against both 'A' and 'C' (refer Section
Ashok Vihar,
Phase III, Delhi ( herein after referred to as "suit shop")
deposited in Court by the plaintiff on 29.09.2010.
2. Brief background ... above application is that
the plaintiff filed the present interpleader suit on 17.10.2009
averring that he was inducted as tenant in respect to the suit
plaint.
2. The properties in suit originally formed part of the Tanjore Palace Estate. In Original Suit No. 3 of 1919 of the District Court ... Vasudeva Sahib, a member of the family. The suit took the form of an interpleader action, but it was in effect a suit for partition
Edition, the
'impleadment' means to bring (someone) into a suit as a new
party, against whom there is an acquisition or a right ... bring (someone) into a law suit; esp., to bring (a new party)
into the action. Cf. Interplead. 2. To bring an action against; to
accuse
V. C. Shukla vs State Through C.B.I on 7 December, 1979
Equivalent citations
Londhoni Devi (A-14) vs The State Through National ... on 7 May, 2013
Bench: I
Asif Hussain Son Of Late Shri Hasan ... vs State Of U.P. And Zafar Ahmed
Smt. Madhu Mishra @ Gudia And Another vs Prem Kumar Mishra on 4 December, 2018
Author
Sri. T. Nagaraju vs The State Of Karnataka on 31 May, 2017
Author: R.B
