Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 344 (0.61 seconds)

Mrsat Pal vs Indo-Tibetan Border Police on 9 December, 2015

Schedule to  the Right of Information Act, 2005 . Hence, as per provisions of  Section 24  of RTI ActITBP is  exempted from the purview ... Act furnishing of  information shall not be exempted under  Section 24(1)  of The RTI Act.    3 Decision: 9.  The CPIO, ITBP was not present
Central Information Commission Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mrmukesh Kumar Sharma vs Indo-Tibetan Border Police on 3 August, 2016

Right to  Information   Act,   2005   (RTI   Act )   before   the   Central   Public   Information   Officer   (CPIO),  Directorate General, Indo Tibetan Border Force (ITBP), New Delhi seeking attested ... submission, submitted that as per  Section 24(1)  of the  RTI ActITBP is exempted from the purview of the  RTI Act , except when
Central Information Commission Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mrsat Pal vs Ministry Of Home Affairs on 25 January, 2016

complaint, and (iii) details of formalities observed by  ITBP under ITBP Act before handing over the case to the CBI, and (iv) copies of relevant ... Schedule to  the Right of Information Act, 2005 .  Hence, as per provisions of  Section 24  of RTI ActITBP is  exempted from the purview
Central Information Commission Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mrkanchan vs Ministry Of Home Affairs on 4 April, 2016

Right to Information Act,  2005   (RTI Act ) before the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO), Indo Tibetan Border  Police Force (ITBP) seeking information on twelve points ... respondent submitted that as per  Section 24(1)  of the RTI ActITBP is exempted  from   the   purview  of  the   RTI   Act ,  except   when
Central Information Commission Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next