Supreme Court rendered in the
case of McDowell & Co. Ltd. v. C.T.O., [1985] 154 ITR 148 and
proceeded to record the following ... Bench of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of McDowell
and Co. Ltd. (supra) where it has been held that even
Mcdowell & Co.Ltd.Thr.Its G.M vs State & Ors on 14 July, 2010
Author: Navin Sinha
Bench: Navin Sinha , Dinesh Kumar Singh
Messrs.Mcdowell And Company Limited vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 22 January, 2010
Author: Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan
Bench: S.R.Bannurmath , Thottathil ... COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WA.No. 1368 of 2007()
1. MESSRS.MCDOWELL AND COMPANY LIMITED ,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED
relied upon the Judgment of the Apex Court in the matter of
McDowell & Company Ltd. and others v/s. Commercial Tax Officer, VII Circle ... herein after referred to as "the 1 st
McDowell case"), as also the Judgment of the Apex Court in the matter of Food
Government Of National Capital ... vs Mcdowell And Co. Ltd And Anr. on 14 September, 2010
Author: S. Muralidhar
Bench: S. Muralidhar
IN THE HIGH COURT ... with
Ms. Latika Chaudhary, Ms. Simran and
Mr. Nitesh Singh, Advocates
Versus
MCDOWELL AND CO. LTD AND ANR. ..... Respondents
Through Mr. Jayant Nath, Senior Advocate
Mcdowell & Co.Ltd.Thr.Its G.M. vs State & Ors on 4 May, 2010
Author: Navin Sinha
Bench: Navin Sinha
IN THE HIGH ... INDUS.L
Versus
STATE & ORS
with
CWJC No.3026 of 1992
MCDOWELL & CO.LTD.THR.ITS G.M.
Versus
STATE & ORS
with
Mcdowell & Company Limited Thru ... vs State Of U.P. Thru Secy. Excise & 3 Ors. ... on 29 July, 2010
Author: Devi Prasad Singh
Bench ... Case :- MISC. BENCH No. - 4493 of 2006
Petitioner :- M/S Mcdowell & Company Limited Thru Executive Legal
A.K.Gupt
Respondent :- State
Also At vs Mcdowell & Company Limited on 19 March, 2010
1
IN THE COURT OF SHRI HARISH DUDANI,
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE15 (CENTRAL) : DELHI ... Beverages,
231 Tagore Park,
Delhi110009. ........Plaintiff/Counter Claimant No.2
Versus
McDowell & Company Limited
a Company incorporated under
Companies Act, 1956 and
having
excise duty was covered by the decision of the Supreme
Court in McDowell's case, (1985) 59 STC 277, petitioners took the
stand that ... sales tax
liability on deferred payment of excise duty was pronounced
in McDowell's case in 1985 and the decision
Coal Corpn. between 29.7.20065 to 18.3.2006.
So far as the rule in Mcdowell & Co. vs. CTO (1985) 154
ITR 148 (SC) is concerned ... Apex Court carved out an
exception from the Mcdowell rule holding that if the
impugned transactions were bona fide and having a clear
financial
