session, two candidates, Arun Kumar and Samir Baishya with aggregate normalised marks of 218 and 216,61 at Serial Nos. 17 and 18 respectively ... Doley at Serial No: 34 of the merit list with aggregate normalised marks of 195 in Physics, Chemistry and Biology and the quota of seats
struck down the
criteria of normalisation, but he has observed
that normalisation should be only in the
marks of the minimum qualifying examination ... many marks proportionately would be out of 800 and then normalise marks of that candidate so that both can be compared. What the University
another candidate of University 'X' (in all subjects) = 65%
Normalised marks of another candidate
= 65/90 x 100= 72.22%
The highest aggregate marks ... another candidate of University 'Y' (in all subjects) = 60%
Normalised marks of another candidate
= 60/80 x 100= 75%
As a matter
normalisation of marks can be done by considering the highest marks secured by students in each subject. Even if there is normalisation of marks across ... Regarding normalisation, different examinations conducted by different authorities have adopted different types of normalisation mechanism. The provision of normalisation of marks is enshrined in Section
petitioner no. 1
Parmanand Mahto who is EBC-I has obtained normalised
marks of 268.7977964, petitioner no. 2 Indu Kerketta, ST has
obtained normalised marks ... Marks (Paper Normalised Combined
Subject Date of Normalised Subject Normalised Qualified/ 2+ paper 3 + Para Marks (Paper 2 + Normalised
Total 380 Category
Details Exam ination
Instruction Manual issued by the second respondent and normalise the marks of
the NIOS Board with the State Board and accordingly prepare and publish ... adopting the method of
normalisation.”
5. Therefore, once any of the Board recognised by the State Government,
normalisation of marks is a norm
National Stock Exchange Information Technology in respect of calculation of
normalised marks for multi-session papers. The counter affidavit is followed by
an additional counter ... arrived at the total marks secured by the petitioner and as to how the marks
was arrived at 98.17 marks.
5. Though the petitioner
serial no. 3513 it is indicated "FEMALE OUT OF UP, Normalised Marks below Vertical Cut-Off OC of 193.8763".
Learned counsel for petitioner ... impugned list i.e. "FEMALE OUT OF UP, Normalised Marks below Vertical Cut-Off OC of 193.8763" so far as it pertains
direct the respondents to disclose the process
and manner in which normalisation of marks
has been carried out between the candidates
who had appeared ... Court may be pleased to declare
the process of merging and normalisation of
marks adopted by the respondent as arbitrary
illegal and void
percentile" formula
has been evolved to standardise or normalise the marks obtained
by the student from different Boards. In the opinion of the State ... State
government could not have introduced the percentile formula for
normalisation of the marks secured by the students passing 10th
standard examination from different Boards
