appellant's father Chinna Munikaruppan was granted patta in respect of Paimash No.105 of Nochiyurani village, Ramanathapuram Taluk, measuring an extent of about ... acres. In the settlement proceedings conducting during 1964, the lands in paimash No.105, 91 & 92 were clubbed together and survey
remaining 15.94 acres in New S.F.No.566/1, Old Paimash No.91, Chinna Sooriyur
Village, Trichy Taluk, Trichy District.
!For Petitioner ... extent of 15.94 acres in New S.F.No.566/1, Old Paimash
No.91 in Chinna Sooriyur Village, Trichy Taluk, Trichy District
judis
W.P.No.8598 of 2023
Punja Paimash No.71, New S.No.11-Hectare 0.2.11, Punja Paimash ... Hectare 0.0.10, Punja Paimash No.73, New
S.No.11-Hectare 0.0.12, Punja Paimash No.66, New S.No.19-Hectare
1.25.7, Punja Paimash
Collectorate, Kancheepuram and to direct him to produce the documents of old Paimash numbers connected with the S.F.No.135(1) part ... Learned counsel for the revision petitioners submitted that to correlate old paimash number with the present suit survey number, the documents are necessary
property of Shanmuga Pillai and Muthu Erulandi Pillai. The suit property includes
Paimash Nos.147 and 147A. Patta number 14 was issued in the name ... defendant's father, Mookandi Thevar @ Moothandi
Thevar and the Paimash No is 133. The zamin patta no.16 was issued to the defendant
delivery of possession. The suit land was
agricultural land comprised in Paimash No.199, measuring 0-4-0 Cawny,
Paimash No.200, measuring ... Cawny Paimash No.201, measuring 0-5-4
Cawny, Paimash No.273, measuring 0-4-0 Cawny, Paimash No.281, measuring
0-4-0 Cawny
lands, but that the state of affairs crystallized in the paimash of 1820 left it at least doubtful whether some change had not been effected ... appeal strongly relies.
18. It may be said of the 1825 paimash or record, taken as a whole, that it does involve certain self-contradictions
writ petitions is house plots covered by Patta
No.130, Paimash No.10, Survey No.242 of Tiruchanur Village
Accounts, Tirupathi Revenue Division, Chittoor District ... part)
and 157 (part) covered by Patta No.30 located in Paimash No.10
(Survey No.242) of Tiruchanur Village Accounts presented by
petitioners
cents, or nearly one acre, identical with Survey No 45 in the paimash or old survey, was shown in the paimash account as "Cherial ... erection on this site by any mirasidar since the date of the paimash (apparently about 1845) and the only building on it was an arrack
judgment pronounced in the said suit, it was observed that Paimash No.165, which was claimed to have been purchased by the plaintiffs therein ... declaration of title and also on the basis of the finding that Paimash No.165 correlated to S.No.84/1A has been found
