contend that the said sale deed was only in respect of
paimash No.590/5 and not paimash No.585/3 and that there ... directed, subject to civil
Court verdict, without going into the correlation of paimash No.590/5 to
survey No.89/15. He would further contend
contend that the said sale deed was only in respect of
paimash No.590/5 and not paimash No.585/3 and that there ... directed, subject to civil
Court verdict, without going into the correlation of paimash No.590/5 to
survey No.89/15. He would further contend
poramboke in
survey and settlements register after the survey. The
correlation of paimash No.14 to Survey No.2 was correct, but
the Settlement Officer ... basis of the oral evidence of the
claimant correlated to paimash Nos.25, 26, 27 and 28 to
Survey No.2 without personal inspection
same.
5.The land in Survey Nos.71/1 and 71/3, (Paimash Nos.558, 558/1
and 620) admeasuring about 3.11 acres as well ... land measuring to an extent of 1.66 acres of land in Paimash
No.558 (66 Cents) and Paimash No.620 (1 acre) was purchased
also been stated that the suit property in Paimash no.226 of Kolathur Village, along with certain other properties had been allotted to the share ... also been stated that on settlement of the suit property, bearing Paimash No.226, correlating to R.S.No.126/7A, the patta had been
wanted to verify the correlation of the paimash number
with the survey number. Accordingly, a report was called
for from the Tahsildar, Vandalur Taluk ... They had given a report stating that there is
no such old paimash No.164/2/3 and that the only
paimash number available
suit was dismissed in respect of remaining extent in old
paimash No.198. The findings of the trail Court were affirmed by the first
appellate ... name of Kandavel Naikkar in relating to the land in old Paimash
No.198 with an extent of 2 acres 70 cents. The plaintiff produced
father by name
Ramachandra Mudaliar originally purchased the property comprised in
Paimash No.967C and 968D, measuring an extent of 0.1.2 kani and 1.15.6
kani ... appellants along with the 1st respondent in respect of the property in
Paimash No.968/D pertaining to S.No.165/3.
Page
petitioner on 22.07.2014 in respect of
the property situate at old Paimash No.195 New Sub Division ... petitioner on
22.07.2014 in respect of the property situate at Old Paimash No.195 New
Sub Division No.220/2, Uliyam Village Hamlet of Chennasandram
possession and enjoyment of the property situated in S.No.511/1
(paimash No.485) ad measuring 22 cents out of 66 cents ... shown as Item No.4 in the plaint. The land situated in
Paimash No.485 originally belonged to one Kamatchiammal in patta
