Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

recent decision of the Madras High Court in the case of Idumba, Parayan v. Pethi Reddi (1919) I.L.R. 43 Mad. 357. It seems

contributories. All the above decisions were considered by a Division Bench in Parayan Prasad v. Gay a Bank and Trades Association

ASHADHA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 7164 OF 2014 PETITIONER: SARATH KRISHNA P. PARAYAN KAZHI, FEROKE P.O., KOZHIKODE 673631. BY ADV SRI.P.P.JACOB

Namuna condition Patta No.26 dated 06.03.1924 issued to P.Kamatch Parayan, copy of resume order Na.Ka.16273/1983, dated 09.07.1986, copy of village

SHANTIBAI DECD. THR LRS. SMT. GIRIJABAI W/O JUGALKISHORE JOSHI NEAR PARAYAN CHOWK RAJGARH (MADHYA PRADESH) 10. SHANTIBAI DECD. THR LRS. INDIRABAI W/O GIRISH

direct the 6th respondent to issue Scheduled Caste Certificate Hindu Parayan (original) to the petitioner within the time limit fixed by this Hon’ble Court

land in question was allotted to an individual, namely Kamatchi Parayan, under the DC category in the year 1924. The legal heirs of the allottee

that was issued by the fourth respondent was wrongly mentioned as 'Parayan'. The petitioner wanted this mistake to be rectified and accordingly, made

SASIDHARAN, PEON (RETIRED), SNUPS, KUNNAPPILLY, PIN-680311, NOW RESIDING AT PARAYAN, VALAPPIL HOUSE, P.O., KUNNAPPALY, MELLOOR VIA.,, THRISSUR-680311. BY ADVS. SRI.K.JAJU

Scheduled Caste. 2.The petitioner contends that he belongs to Scheduled Caste Parayan Community and his wife namely, Dr.P.Shanmugapriya belongs to Backward Kallar ... issue community certificates to their children that they belong to Hindu Parayan Community. As the said representation was not considered, the petitioner approached this Court