petitioner had married S.Anusuya, who belongs to Hindu Parayan Community. They have two children out of the wedlock, namely, Thaaragai and Thaarini
learned advocate for the appellant relied on the decision in Pena Parayan Ambalam v. Venkatachala Chettiar 1960-1 Mad LJ 346, for the position that
scope of the principle laid down by Schwabe C. J. Idumbu Parayan v. Pethu Reddi
recent decision of the Madras High Court in the case of Idumbu Parayan v. Pethu Reddy
also not in dispute that the Petitioner
belongs to the Scheduled Caste Parayan, Paraya, which are
duly recognised in Karnataka to be Scheduled Castes
which, Senthilkumar abused them in filthy words and called him as
Parayan. Therefore, he gave a complaint at PCR Cell, Puducherry, but no
action
what
caste he belongs to and stated that the complainant
belongs to ‘Parayan’ caste. Thereafter, the accused stated
that, “if you people are appointed
Bir Singh vs Delhi Jal Board . on 30 August, 2018
Author: Ranjan Gogoi
Bench: Ranjan
Kuravan
6.Madiga
7.Mala, Mala Masti
8.Paky
9.Pallan
10.Parayan, Sambavar
11.Samban
12.Thoti
13.Valluvan
14.Vetan
15.Vettiyan
I.Kezhson vs The Director Of Town Panchayat on 26 August, 2025
Author: C.Saravanan