Karamvir Parcha And Ors vs State Of Haryana And Anr on 12 September, 2017
Author: Anupinder Singh Grewal
Bench: Anupinder Singh Grewal
IN THE HIGH ... CHANDIGARH
257 CRM-M-18805-2017
DATE OF DECISION: 12.09.2017
KARAMVIR PARCHA AND ORS. ... Petitioner(s)
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. ... Respondent(s)
CORAM
Assistant Sub-Inspector,
Mangilal (PW.12) of Police Station Rajgarh, recorded
statement („Parcha-Bayan‟) Ex.P/19) of Smt. Suresh Devi,
wife of accused appellant ... recorded by the ASI, Mangilal (PW.12), upon that FIR was
registered. The said „Parcha-Bayan‟ of the injured was
recorded
upon dying
declaration in the form of „Parcha-Bayan‟ (Ex.P/3) and
statement (Ex.P/12) of the deceased recorded by the
Judicial Magistrate ... dying
declaration of Smt. Radha Devi. The FIR was registered
upon „Parcha-Bayan‟ (Ex.P/3) of deceased, Smt. Radha
Devi, recorded
stated, the facts of the case are that on 12 th of
October 2005, Parcha Bayan of injured Sandeep Kumar
(Complainant) was recorded
Quddus,
151, Gali No.3, Sangam Vihar,
Wazirabad, Delhi-110084.
12. Sh. Manoj Kumar Parcha, Age 41,
S/o Sh. Puran Singh Parcha
there is major contradiction about the
reason for incident in the "Parcha-Bayan" and dying-declaration of
the deceased, therefore ... Parcha-Bayan" (Ex.P/19)
of the deceased on 04.07.2008 upon which FIR was registered)
(15 of 35)
[CRLA-536/2012]
and PW.12
American Hospital for treatment. Kailash
Chandra, S.H.O. recorded the parcha bayan of Pawan at the
hospital on 6.11.2012 at 8:05 PM. Pawan ... alleged in his statement
that he was having a shop 'no.12' bearing the title 'Kesariya
Bhanwarlal Ambalal' in Krishi Mandi
Sections 11 / 12 of the POCSO
Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner drew the Court's attention
to the parcha bayan of deceased Pooja
order dated 07.12.2007/17.12.2007
passed by the District Collector, Madhubani, setting aside the
issuance of basgit parcha issued in the year
respondents and actual owner of goods did not deliberately turn up for 12 days for physical verification of the goods loaded in the truck ... were found different than the goods declared.
(ii) Kachcha parchas of goods of estimated value covered by G.R. Nos.61694 and 61613 were found
