Vinayak
Belapurkar, was dealing with an argument that by virtue of
the compromise, during the pendency of the suit, there was a
transfer of property ... This court, in the facts of the case,
held that the compromise partially recognised the title of the
plaintiff to institute the suit for redemption
place
to mention here that there was already a partial compromise that was
granted by this Court by order dated 07.01.2019. It was between
place
to mention here that there was already a partial compromise that was
granted by this Court by order dated 07.01.2019. It was between
place
to mention here that there was already a partial compromise that was
granted by this Court by order dated 07.01.2019. It was between
place
to mention here that there was already a partial compromise that was
granted by this Court by order dated 07.01.2019. It was between
place
to mention here that there was already a partial compromise that was
granted by this Court by order dated 07.01.2019. It was between
stake holder to the compensation had objection as
regards to partial compromise that took place before the
authority. He would submit that any compromise must
speaking to the minutes of
order dated 12.09.2023.
2. The terms of compromise were placed before the Court
between the parties to the present appeal ... From the submissions made above, it appears that
it was a partial compromise between few parties to the suit.
4. In pursuance of the statement
Writ Petition
No.3376/1994 alongwith connected writ petitions. Since partial
compromise is sought amongst the parties, it would be just
Writ Petition
No.3376/1994 alongwith connected writ petitions. Since partial
compromise is sought amongst the parties, it would be just
