Presidency Town of Bombay.
17. So, too, in Waghela Rajsanji v. Shekh Masludin ... that purpose Kashiram Krishna v. Bhadu Bapuji (1870) 7 B. H. C. R (A. C.J.), 17 ; Parvathi v. Mannar
right of action to the person damaged by such publication: See Ratcliffe v. Evans (1863) 9 Moo. I.A. 387, 426.
24. There are certain ... plaintiff, of which the most important is the case of Parvathi v. Mannar (1884) I.L.R. 8 Mad. 175 in which it was held
cases; but this Court extended the law of slander in Parvathi v. Mannar
Mahmud J. followed the view of Turner C.J. expressed in Parvathi v. Mannar (1885) 8 Mad. 175. In that case it was held that
Naluvila Bhagavathi Devaswom Trust vs Omanakumari on 31 August, 2022
Author: M.R.Anitha
Bench
