application was directed to be moved for seeking a
passover. Thereafter, at 11:15 am, the proxy counsel sought some
accommodation as the main counsel ... Trial Court
insisted upon an application being filed even for seeking a passover. The
main counsel was only 15 to 20 minutes late, and despite
Court.
12. We are happy to record that today, though after several passovers,
possibilities of amicable settlement appear. The counsel for the appellants
as well
said documents to the counsel for the petitioner. Though on passover, the
counsel for the petitioner complained that the copy of the letter dated 29th
Petitioner to
contact ld. counsel for the Respondent. After the Passover - Mr. Birender
Singh, Authorised Representative of the Respondent joined the proceedings.
Mr. Singh submits
refiling
appeal)
1. Counsel for the appellant is not available today and passover is
sought.
2. The matter is unlikely to reach, if passed over
July, 2019, 4th September, 2019 and 17th
February, 2020.
9. Today also passover is sought on the ground of non-availability of the
arguing counsel
Conferencing.
Counsel for the parties could not be connected even in the passover.
Accordingly, list day after tomorrow (06.11.2020).
(SUJOY PAUL)
JUDGE
s@if
Signature
applying to the land of the
appellants/applicants also.
9. On passover, Mr. Kunal Sharma, counsel for the respondent OL has
appeared and on enquiry ... Though the presence of Mr. Lorren Bamniyal was also requested on
passover but we are informed that he is ailing and is unable to appear
appears on behalf of the petitioners.
There is neither any request for passover nor any adjournment slip from the petitioners or their counsel.
Writ petition
counsel for appellant was busy in another case he requested
for a passover which was not granted and the arguments were heard
by a single
