refusal could arise only if the endorsement 'refused' was proved by evidence, and this could only be done by producing the postman ... postman unless the postman is examined and such endorsement was inadmissible in evidence. The Full Bench thus answered the question accordingly holding that postman
refusal could arise only if the endorsement 'refused' was proved by evidence, and this could only be done by producing the postman ... postman unless the postman is examined and such endorsement was inadmissible in evidence. Full Bench thus answered the question accordingly holding that postman
refusal could arise only if the endorsement 'refused' was proved by evidence, and this could only be done by producing the postman ... postman unless the postman is examined, and, such endorsement was inadmissible in evidence. The Full Bench thus answered the question, accordingly, holding that postman
applicant/defendant no.4 has argued
that one endorsement of refusal of the postman should not be taken as a
correct basis for proceeding ... learned Single Judge of this Court has held
the endorsement of refusal of postman not to be believable on account of the
two conflicting endorsements
refusal could arise only if the endorsement ''refused' was proved by evidence, and this could only be done by producing the postman ... postman unless the postman is examined, and, such endorsement was inadmissible in evidence. The Full Bench thus answered the question, accordingly, holding that postman
refusal could arise only if the endorsement ''refused' was proved by evidence, and this could only be done by producing the postman ... postman unless the postman is examined, and, such endorsement was inadmissible in evidence. The Full Bench thus answered the question, accordingly, holding that postman
refusal could arise only if the endorsement ''refused' was proved by evidence, and this could only be done by producing the postman ... postman unless the postman is examined, and, such endorsement was inadmissible in evidence. The Full Bench thus answered the question, accordingly, holding that postman
refusal could arise only if the endorsement 'refused' was proved by evidence, and this could only be done by producing the postman ... postman unless the postman is examined and such endorsement was inadmissible in evidence. The Full Bench thus answered the question accordingly holding that postman
given by postman and no such
postman has come forward at the residence of tenant and he has not
refused to accept suit notice ... been given to tenant by any postman and no
postman went for it and he has not refused suit notice and suit filed
by plaintiff
therefore they have not refused to accept
the same and if there is any report of refusal given by the postman then same is
false ... that they have not
refused to accept the same and if there is any report of refusal given by the
postman on registered envelop then
