therefore of the view that the grounds on which
the Application of recusal is made by Advocate
Nedumpara and his client are wholly baseless ... unfounded. I have no doubt that the present Application
15
seeking recusal of this Court, to borrow the language of
the Hon’ble Supreme Court
counsel for the parties, on the
application, at length. Various averments have been made in the
application for recusal. At the same time, after matter ... petition filed by the Government.
The effects of filing the recusal application shall also be
considered while taking a call on the aforesaid issue
petitioner, who appears in-person, has filed an application for recusal on
the ground that this Bench is “prejudiced” against him. The application is
frivolous ... rise to any apprehension. It is without basis or substance. The
application for recusal is hence rejected.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally signed by
Chetan Kumar
rejected.
Consequently, application for permission to appear and argue in person
does not survive and stands disposed of.
Application seeking recusal from hearing ... 102275/2023 - APPLICATION FOR LISTING REVIEW PETITION IN
OPEN COURT, IA No. 102274/2023 - APPLICATION FOR RECUSAL, IA No.
102277/2023 - CONDONATION OF DELAY
filed Civil Writ Petition No. 1045
of 2018, by this application has sought recusal of the Chief
Justice from the Bench hearing the matter ... justice. The grounds stated by Shri Harsh Mander in his application
for recusal of the Chief Justice from the Bench therefore have the
potential
Amicus in W.P.
(Crl.) No. 129/2012.
Order reserved on recusal application in Raj Kumar Brojen
[W.P. (Crl.) No. 206/2018] and Lourembam
listed after the pronouncement of Judgment on recusal
application in Raj Kumar Brojen [W.P. (Crl.) No. 206/2018] and
Lourembam Deben Singh
effort was made to derail the proceedings by filing an
application for recusal of the learned Judge who had substantially
heard the matter. The said
preliminary issue be framed and decided; and (iv) the
Arbitrator having recused, an application was filed under Section 11 read
with Sections
Interim Application No.48502 of 2020
This is an application filed by Contemnor No.3-Nilesh Ojha for
recusal of one of (Deepak Gupta ... heard and we see
no ground for one of us to recuse. The application is accordingly
rejected.
Interim Application No. 48483 of 2020
Signature
