again with a view of correction or improvement. Therefore, in reviewing an answer script, the reviewing examiner is required to revisit and re-examine ... answer script, then the reviewing examiner should examine each of the answers as if he is examining the said answer script for the first time
submitted an application before
the respondent‐school service commission for review of his
answer scripts by a communication issued . The petitioner was
informed that there ... West Bengal School
Service Commission Act, 1997 for review of the answer scripts.
Having heard the learned counsel apparing for the respective
parties as also
sequence and the order in which the examiner
or the reviewer marked the answer script of the candidate appearing at the B.Sc. Part ... shall indicate how many times the answer script was reviewed, if
answer script is reviewed more than once whether that was as per the relevant
Examination to dispose of the application of the petitioner for review
of his answer script of Physics subject. The petitioner appeared in the
Higher Secondary ... petitioner deposited the
2
requisite costs of post publication review of his answer script on May
31, 2014 (annexure "P 5" at page
Council has framed regulations for post-publication review
of answer-scripts of examinees who take the higher secondary
examination.
It is submitted ... available an
opportunity to an unsuccessful examinee to have his/her answer-
scripts reviewed/re-assessed. Whether or not the petitioner has
-: 2 : -
answered
appellant Council submitted that there was no provision for
review/reevaluation of answer scripts under the relevant rules.
He further submitted that there ... Supreme Court. Admittedly, there is no provision permitting
reevaluation/review of answer scripts. It was the onus of the
respondent/writ petitioner to show that
petitioner by the concerned examiner. After
scrutiny the answer script of the petitioner, amongst other answer scripts,
was referred to the Coordinator‐cum‐Head Examiner ... Examiner for
review or re‐assessment of the answer script of the petitioner. Referring
answer scripts of all the candidates to the Coordinator‐cum‐Head
above
examination. After obtaining the true copy of the above answer script of the
petitioner under the Right to Information Act, 2005 it was detected ... petitioner
that the scrutineer has no right to review the answer script of an examinee, I
find that the petitioner has not only made
above answer scripts was
not done.
The examiner concerned was the best person to assess the above answer
scripts. No specific allegation is available with ... though the petitioner was eligible for
submitting an application for review of answer scripts, she had not availed of the
opportunity.
In view
writ petitioner submits
that writ petitioner made application for reviewing his answer
scripts. He also prayed for copies by filing application under
Right to Information ... review, therefore, the papers should be reviewed by the
University. Accordingly University authorities are directed to
carry out the review of the answer scripts
