erstwhile State of Jind obtained certain concessions from
the Ruler of the State under an agreement dated April 1,
1938, -which, inter alia, provided that ... assessed at
concessional rates. On May 5, 1948, the Ruler of jind along
with the Rulers of seven other States entered into a
Covenant
Khorposh Allowance-Sanad granted by Ruler of State-
Discontinuance of cash allowance by Government of Orissa
after merger-Validity-Sanad, if law or executive ... issued by Government of Orissa, cl. 4(b).
HEADNOTE:
The Ruler of Dhenkanal State granted a sanad by way of
Khorposh allowance to his younger
Hereditary Military Pension--Bachat--Right to receive
guaranteed by Kalambandis issued by Rulers of Gwalior--If
can be terminated by executive order--Kalambandis: if
existing ... recipient of a hereditary military
pension called Bachat granted by the Rulers of Gwalior to
his ancestors in recognition of military service. The right
State of Matsya. Then came another union of certain
other Rulers in Rajasthan in March 1948 by which these
Rulers united under the Ruler ... United State of Rajasthan was formed by Covenant
entered into by fourteen Rulers of Rajasthan, including
these who had formed the Former State of Rajasthan
instrument
of accession. This was followed by a merger agreement between the Ruler of
the Rampur State and the Dominion of India ... which the
Ruler agreed to transfer the entire administration of the State to the
Dominion as from July 1, 1949. The Governor General then passed
that Article Contemplated that the Maharaja was to be
a constitutional ruler. The temporary provisions of that
Article were
272
based on the assumption that ... Maharaja
35
274
Hari Singh succeeded Maharaja Pratap Singh as the Ruler of
Kashmir. It appears that for some time prior to 1934 there
Civil Procedure , 1908 (Act 5 of 1908). ss. 86,
87B--Protection of ruler from being sued--Whether applies to
proceedings for adjudication of Industrial Dispute ... Constitution of India, Art. 362-- Rights, privileges and
Immunities of Rulers, nature of.
HEADNOTE:
A dispute arose between the appellant and his employees
Suit against Former Ruler-Requirement of consent of Central
Government-Constitutional validity- Code of Civil Procedure ,
1908 (Act 5 of 1908), ss. 87B, 86-Constitution ... Code of Civil Procedure to
sue the Maharaja of Tripura, Ruler of a former Indian State,
which has merged with India. They wanted to implead
Suit against foreign
State Consent of Central Government whether necessary
-'Ruler of a foreign State' whether distinguishable from
foreign State for the purpose ... suit was incompetent inasmuch
as the suit was in substance against the Ruler of the United
Arab Republic and consent of the Central Government under
India, 1950, Arts, 14 and 366(22)-- Orissa
Private Lands of Rulers (Assessment of Rent) Act (13 of
1958), ss. 5 and 6--Validity ... Ruler", meaning of.
HEADNOTE:
The petitioners in these three writ petitions challenged the
operative provisions of the Orissa Private Lands of Rulers
(Assessment
