Section 4 in The Bombay Revenue Jurisdiction Act, 1876 [Entire Act]
lands held under treaty, or to lands granted or held as saranjam, or on other political tenure, or to lands declared by Government
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 229 (0.97 seconds)H.H. Sir Sayaji Rao, Gaekwar Of Baroda vs Madhavrao Raghunathrao Dhavale on 16 July, 1928
Exhibit A in this appeal, held that that grant was one of Saranjam. I may here mention that Exhibit A was admitted by consent ... Code. The Gaikwar accepts the position that in fact this was a Saranjam grant, is contended by Divan Bahadur Rao for the plaintiff-respondent that
The Secretary Of State For India vs Girjabai Shivdeorao Vinchurkar on 15 August, 1924
deceased heirless person. That right forms no part of the Saranjam. Whether it be a Saranjam village or an Inam village, the right in such ... outset that in this case it is an admitted fact that the Saranjam was a grant of the royal share of the revenue
Sakharam Govind Page vs Trimbakrao Ramchandrarao Mantri on 28 September, 1920
which arises for consideration is the nature of the tenure of this Saranjam. The history and origin of this Bagni Saranjam have been the subject ... satisfactorily shown that the village of Bagni was held as a personal Saranjam by the family of Venkatrav Bhaskar for a century before the introduction
Madhavrao Hariharrao vs Anusuyabai Eknath Jape on 15 June, 1916
plaintiff alleged that he was the saranjamdar of the ancestral saranjam village of Janu where the lands in question were situate; that the lands were ... with the defendants.
2. According to the plaint this is a hereditary saranjam village. Saranjams are held subject to the saranjam rules published by Government
Trimbak Ramchandra Pandit vs Shekh Gulam Zilani Waiker on 8 December, 1909
Inam ' rights in the lands in suit appertain to a Saranjam held on political tenure and that the present incumbent of the Saranjam ... eject them. The lower appellate Court held it proved that the Saranjam was created prior to 1785 and that the lands in suit
Shrimant Raje Bahadur Raghojirao Saheb vs Shrimant Raje Lakshmanrao Saheb on 18 July, 1912
revenue to the grantee. The Marathi equivalent to the term jaghir, namely, saranjam, came in course of time to be applied to the lands ... Courts below to the distinction between the term inam and saranjam. The importance has reached this point, that the learned Judges treat the lands
Ramchandra Ganpatrao Dalvi vs Lakshmibai Shamrao Kalkundri on 1 October, 1937
entered in the records the property in suit as sarva inam political saranjam Class I, descendible to the male heirs of the holders ... plaintiff nor defendants Nos. 2 to 8 were members of the saranjam family ; that the plaint village was not a saranjam of the plaintiff
Shrimant Sardar Bhujangarao Daulatrao ... vs Shrimant Malojirao Daulatrao Ghorpade ... on 30 January, 1952
Bose, J.
1. The plaintiff appeals.
2. The suit relates to a Saranjam estate in the State of Bombay. The plaintiff claims ... ancestor of the present parties was given the Gajendragad estate as a Saranjam some time before the advent of the British. When they arrived
Shrimant Dattajirao Bahirojirao ... vs Shrimant Vijayasinhrao And Anr. on 29 April, 1960
these. Gajendragad in Taluk Ron in the district of Dharwar is a Saranjam estate known as the Gajendragad Saranjam bearing number 91 in the Saranjam ... properties in suit. One Bhujangarao Daulatrao Ghorpade was the holder of the Saranjam estate at the relevant time. In 1932 the Saranjam was resumed