Sneh to carry on the
construction work with due diligence, that is, late commencement of
work, slow progress, sub-standard work, non adherence to agreed
performer considering the poor performance
of the Claimant and slow progress of work. The Tribunal
observed that considering the ground realities of non-
availability ... realizing that the
Claimant was not at all responsible for slow progress of
work, had recommended to the competent authority of the
Respondent to exclude
expressed concerns about the
progress of work being slow and unless the work proceeded with diligence,
the work may not get completed in time ... Hence the inadequacy of
labour & materials has resulted in slow progress of
work & being not commensurate with the time spent
since taken over
action under Clause 52 of the Agreement on the
ground of slow work progress is just and proper because
he has not completed the work ... progress of
work is satisfactory and delay was due to beyond the
control of the contractor. As the progress was very slow,
the petitioner within
Contractor. The reason
for cancellation of contract of complainant was slow progress of work due to
bad planning and company of complainant was debarred from ... Patiala area. The reason of
cancellation of contracts was slow progress of work
due to bad planning which may be due to bad
financial position
contribution delay caused by the respondent
on account of slow progress in execution of the work. The petitioner was
held responsible ... petitioner stating that on account of the suspension of the work and
slow progress, the work has not been completed within the stipulated period
agreed, in the reply to the termination letter, that the slow progress of the
work was for reasons "beyond our control". Thus ... effect, the Petitioner
admitted in its letter that there was slow progress of work. In the said reply
to the termination letter dated 12th July
eligible to participate. Chauhan was apprised then that the slow
progress of work in the contract was a reason for its listing or debarment ... either
parties and alleged that there has been unacceptable slow progress of work
which justified the impugned WLR. It is stated that Chauhan was lagging
stood thus, the 1st Defendant issued 7 days notice
for slow progress of work vide letter dated 23.01.2009. The
Plaintiff in its letter dated ... Defendant sent 7 days' notice to the Plaintiff for
slow progress of work vide letter dated 23.01.2009. The
Plaintiff replied on 27.01.2009 stating that
issue and address the concern of
defendant no. 1 qua slow progress of piling work, a meeting was
held on 02.08.2007 at the site ... plaintiff
informed the representatives of defendant no. 1 that slow progress of
work was due to insufficient cash flow from the side of defendant