Smt. Sureshta Devi vs Om Prakash on 7 February, 1991
Equivalent citations: 1992 AIR 1904, 1991 SCR (1) 274, AIR 1992 SUPREME COURT ... Shetty
Bench: K.J. Shetty , S.C. Agrawal
PETITIONER:
SMT. SURESHTA DEVI
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
OM PRAKASH
DATE OF JUDGMENT07/02/1991
BENCH:
SHETTY
Satyender Sharma & Ors vs Smt. Sureshta Devi & Others on 25 June, 2024
Author: Virender Singh
Bench: Virender Singh ... Decided on: 25.6.2024
Satyender Sharma & ors.
... Applicants/appellants
Versus
Smt. Sureshta Devi & others
...Non-applicants/Respondents
_____________________________ ______________
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender
Smt. Sureshta Devi vs The State Of on 14 November, 2025
Smt. Sureshta Devi versus The State of
.
Himachal Pradesh and others
CWPOA
Smt. Sureshta Devi vs . Hpsebl & Ors. on 13 March, 2026
Author: Ajay Mohan Goel
Bench: Ajay Mohan Goel
.
Smt. Sureshta Devi Vs. HPSEBL
placing reliance on the
two judgments of the Apex Court in Smt. Sureshta Devi
Vs. Om Prakash ( 1991) 2 SCC 25 and Anil Kumar Jain ... also found that the Apex Court decision in the
case of Smt. Sureshta Devi (Supra) was not brought to
the notice of the learned Judge
plea raised by the
respondents while relying upon Smt. Sureshta Devi (supra) and
Sandhya Mukhi (supra) that the consent can be withdrawn at any
point ... detriment
of the petitioner.
24. The case of Smt. Sureshta Devi (supra) has no application to the
facts of the present case
upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Smt. Sureshta Devi v. Om Prakash , to buttress their submission. It may be noticed ... reasoning given by the Supreme Court in the case of Smt. Sureshta Devi and concluded that the Family Court's view as recorded
withdrawal of the consent is not
permissible.
8. In reference to Smt Sureshta Devi V/s
Om Prakesh [(1991) 2 SCC 25], it is contended ... Rupa Bipin Zaveri [(1997) 4 SCC
226], to contend that Smt Sureshta Devi (supra) was
felt to have laid down a very wide observation
this Court. The
issue was raised in the case of Smt. Sureshta Devi vs. Om
Prakash [(1991) 2 SCC 25], wherein this Court held that ... have to be
given effect to. The law as explained in Smt. Sureshta
Devi 's case (supra) still holds good, though with certain
variations
upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Smt. Sureshta Devi v. Om Parkash ... judgment by the Apex Court in Smt. Sureshta Devi 's case (supra) is no longer a binding precedent as its ratio descendi has been
