managerial or in administrative or supervisory capacity
whereas the management stated that both the claimants were
appointed on supervisory, managerial and administrative
post.
(b) Whether ... This
further shows that the claimant Satyapal Singh worked in
supervisory/managerial capacity. Ex. WW1 /M11 is a report in
Form
petitioner did not have the necessary five years experience in a supervisory/managerial capacity in a technical organisation or industrial concern in Drug Pharmaceutical Fine ... certificate which shows that in fact, he had experience in supervisory/managerial capacity for five years. He submits that the petitioner was in service
Medical sales
representatives and he was not engaged in Administrative,
Managerial and Supervisory Capacity. Therefore, in case of Santan
Kumar, provisions ... Sales Promotion Employees
who do not work in supervisory/managerial/administrative capacity
are covered under the Industrial Disputes Act ; for Sales Promotion
Employees who work
managerial or in administrative or supervisory capacity
whereas the management stated that both the claimants were
appointed on supervisory, managerial and administrative
post.
(b) Whether ... This
further shows that the claimant Satyapal Singh worked in
supervisory/managerial capacity. Ex. WW1 /M11 is a report in
Form
employed in a supervisory capacity.
Whether a person's employment is in a "supervisory
capacity" or not in a particular case must ... supervisory capacity and his functions
must be mainly of a managerial nature. If he is
employed mainly in managerial or administrative
capacity, then of course
gives an impression that the complainant was engaged in
a managerial/supervisory capacity, though within the precincts of the
petitioner's factory ... parties therefore show that the complainant was serving in
a managerial/supervisory capacity and came within the exception
provided under Section 4(2) read with
appears that any person
employed primarily in the managerial, administrative, supervisory or
technical capacity drawing basic salary, excluding allowances, exceeding
Rs.6,500/-per month ... otherwise, that the person, who is employed primarily in the
managerial, supervisory or technical capacity and who draws the basic
salary excluding allowances, not exceeding
KPIs were produced were performing their duties in the
capacity of supervisory / managerial and therefore, they cannot be
termed as "workman ... 2016 CAV JUDGMENT
employees were performing their duties in their capacity as supervisory /
managerial, which the Management has failed. It is submitted that
employed in a public
limited Company and had such experience of managerial/
supervisory capacity for more than three years from 28.3.2005 to
4.9.2009 is evident ... does not
require any minimum salary to be drawn in the
managerial/supervisory capacity in which an applicant is working.
The attempt of the Senior
appellant that he had no experience to his credit of any
managerial/supervisory capacity. The learned Single Judge found
and observed as under ... rejected. Admittedly, the appellant had no
working experience in managerial/supervisory capacity; and the
certificate stating his working as 'Delivery Salesman' could
