mistake in future. The revocation was, therefore,
clearly conditional accompanied with punitive comments.
26. The respondent/petitioner instead of tendering an apology,
wrote back ... this reason that the revocation order was made
conditional, compelling the respondent/petitioner to tender an apology
and accept the lapses. This was clearly rebutted
tender condition and for the subsequent
34.2 weeks @ 12% uniform rate. As per Clause 16.2 (v) of the
tender conditions, the total value ... this condition also.
Given the fact that revocation after termination was not
supported by the tender conditions, giving extension based on the
written undertaking
same also forwarded before the respondent no. 3 for revocation of his resignation dated 31.07.2002 tendered in pursuance to modified Voluntary Retirement Scheme ... same also forwarded before the respondent no. 3 for revocation of his resignation dated 31.07.2002 tendered in pursuance to Modified Voluntary Retirement Scheme.
16. That
required conditions
prescribed under Section 308 Cr.P.C for its revocation. Learned Amicus
Curiae has made reference to the case of Abu Salem Abdul ... note in the foregoing paragraphs. The
principles for tendering pardon to an accomplice or its revocation are
contained in Section 306 to 308 under Chapter
claiming rights on the said plot. Since that revocation deed was
subsequently tendered and since the transaction was already
completed, the subsequent letter of Applicant
claiming rights on the said plot. Since that revocation deed was
subsequently tendered and since the transaction was already
completed, the subsequent letter of Applicant
claiming rights on the said plot. Since that revocation deed was
subsequently tendered and since the transaction was already
completed, the subsequent letter of Applicant
pointed out that the proposal tendered by the MMRDA
for revocation of the Notification issued under Section 32 (1) of the
Bombay Metropolitan Region Development
Learned Advocate appearing for the Petitioner has
tendered the draft amendments and seeks to amend the Revocation
Petition No.74 of 1998 in Probate Petition
2003, 54/2003; and to tender
apology for the said oversight.
(ii). Take appropriate steps for due revocation of
the aforesaid „no objection‟ given
