year 2003,
serious allegations were made in respect of plagiarism in the
thesis submitted by M. Venkataramanappa. The second
respondent initially referred the matter ... indicted for plagiarism
by the Commission not merely in respect of the thesis on
which he was conferred the Ph.D. degree but also
required under the regulations, has become
eligible for submission of the Thesis and submitted his
thesis in the month of November 2006. The respondent
identified ... examiners on 2.12.2006. The guide of the
petitioner, after evaluating the Thesis, has accepted the
same and subsequently has given clarifications sought.
On 5.7.2007, foreign
grace
period of three years was avaflable to him to present the
thesis, which means he was a resident student for three
years from ... would have
completed the course, but he had to prepare the thesis and
submit the same to the University. The petitioner was
appointed
petitioner, on the basis of the
the".Inquiw Commission as his thesis contained
0 V pasjsages.
r'!
A ~--Sri Subramanya Jois, the learned ... take action for the annulment of Ph.D. degree in
of plagiarized thesis under Section 8(4) of the said Act,
RBH.
petitioner cannot feign
doctrine of equality; the exercise of
unfettered discretion is the anti thesis to the concept of rule of
law.
9
16. The Apex Court
Respondent
il':(By;Sri_Chandrashelgar P Patil, Adv.)
Thesie»_Crinrivnial Appeals are filed under S.378(l) & (3) of
Cr.PC Vagainst
rtqulreci to perform di the
Nos.l and
ioaei's thesis.
consequential acts of tec"etvrng
FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the thesis
submitted by the petitioner has been evaluated, as such, petition has
become infructuous
SITES ('1 1 12
DA'LD)O 04 '012
THESI 'RI1 PFflT!.js cur-uric •'N FOR
r LaMINAR htAFIIJ
againrsi, $32 a£:<::3,s§§.
V ii3_ thesi ?,E%f.3 cguéd 30% E253
