Deputy Conservator Of Forests vs Timblo Irmaos Ltd. on 18 December, 2020
Bench: Sanjay Kishan Kaul , Dinesh Maheshwari , Hrishikesh Roy
1
ITEM NO.8 Court ... Judicature
At Bombay At Goa)
DEPUTY CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
TIMBLO IRMAOS LTD. & ORS. Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION
Sarvesh Pramod Timblo S/O Pramod ... vs Union Of India on 8 September, 2020
Author: Ashok Kumar Gaur
Bench: Ashok Kumar Gaur
HIGH COURT ... JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9846/2020
1. Sarvesh Pramod Timblo S/o Pramod Panduromga Timblo,
Aged About 40 Years, Resident
Cricket Club Of India Ltd vs Akash Timblo on 9 March, 2020
Author: A.S. Gadkari
Bench: A.S. Gadkari ... Cricket Club of India Ltd. ... Petitioner
Vs.
Akash Timblo ... Respondent
Mr.P.K. Dhakephalkar a/w. Mr.Sumanth Anchan, Mr.Naresh Patnani and
Mr.Hetal
Cricket Club Of India Ltd vs Akash Timblo on 6 February, 2020
Author: Revati Mohite Dere
Bench: Revati Mohite Dere
IN THE HIGH COURT ... Cricket Club Of India Ltd. ....Petitioner
V/S
Akash Timblo ....Respondent
CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J
DATE : 6th February, 2020
P.C. :
Due to paucity
Cricket Club Of India Ltd vs Akash Timblo on 27 January, 2020
Author: Revati Mohite Dere
Bench: Revati Mohite Dere
IN THE HIGH COURT ... Cricket Club Of India Ltd. ....Petitioner
V/S
Akash Timblo ....Respondent
Sumanth Anchan a/w Naresh Ranani and MS.Hetal Master i/by
Ashwin Ankhad
Cricket Club Of India Ltd vs Akash Timblo on 27 January, 2020
Author: Revati Mohite Dere
Bench: Revati Mohite Dere
IN THE HIGH COURT ... Cricket Club Of India Ltd. ....Petitioner
V/S
Akash Timblo ....Respondent
Sumanth Anchan a/w Naresh Ratnani and MS.Hetal Master
i/byAshwin Ankhad
Paryavaran Savrakshan Sangharsh Samitee
V/s
M/s Sociedade Timblo Irmaos LTDA & Ors.
And
Goa Paryavaran Savrakshan Sangharsh Samitee
V/s
M/s. Sesa ... Paryavaran Savrakshan Sangharsh Samitee
V/s
M/s Sociedade Timblo Irmaos Ltda & Ors.
And
Goa Paryavaran Savrakshan Sangharsh Samitee
V/s
Gangadhar Narsingdas Agarwal
titled as Deputy
Conservator of Forests vs. Timblo Irmaos Ltd. & Ors. ,
decided on 18.12.2020, refused to differentiate between the
government and private party
