Monika Malik :
Counsel for petitioners has moved an application IA-3 seeking transposition of parties in the revision memo. In this application learned counsel ... counsel for petitioners and also having gone through the IA-3, application regarding transposition of parties, we allow this application and direct the counsel
even on facts.
viii. The Ld. Counsel further submitted that the Application for
transposition was allowed by this Commission by an
Order passed ... Respondents-2 and 3 have
no locus standi in filing the application for transposition
as Appellants-2 and 3 in the present Appeal
parties.
7. Before delving into merits of the case, we find an Application
under Order 1 Rule 10 read with Section 151 of CPC filed ... Complainants pending for consideration. The Complainants have
filed the said application for transposition of the Opposite Party
No.3&4/Performa Respondents
even produced a copy of such application
for our perusal. Be that as it may, till today such application ... petitioner. Hence,
merely on the ground of pendency of an application for
transposition, we are unable to set aside the impugned order and
give relief
Application bearing No. 548/2013 is taken up for hearing. MA application has been filed by the Revision Petitioners praying for transposition of the Respondent ... concerned about the transposition about the Respondent Nos. 2 & 3. Having heard both sides we allow this application bearing No. 548/2013. The names
application for
accepting the amended memo has been allowed. He submits that the
said order has become final and therefore the transposition is
complete. Accordingly
passed in Criminal-cum-Application/EA
No.97/2017 and he also sought similar such relief in Criminal-
cum-Application/EA No.98/2017 ... partition. No doubt, Order 1 Rule 10 (6) of CPC provides for
transposition of defendant as plaintiff/Dhr as the case may be,
but facts
passed in Criminal-cum-Application/EA
No.97/2017 and he also sought similar such relief in Criminal-
cum-Application/EA No.98/2017 ... partition. No doubt, Order 1 Rule 10 (6) of CPC provides for
transposition of defendant as plaintiff/Dhr as the case may be,
but facts
