such, there is no encumbrance on the said properties.
36. On 08.06.2021, UPRERA Bench -01, while dealing with projects
of the Petitioner qua other properties ... Pradesh shall be sold by the Deponent until further
orders. Thereafter the UPRERA bench – 01 formed a monitoring
committee to oversee the refund
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority (hereinafter
referred to as “UPRERA”), the order of the Resolution Professional
(R.P.) proposing that they be treated differently ... delay in the
completion of the project, the appellants approached the UPRERA
which
Signature Not Verified
by its orders upheld this entitlement to refund amounts
High Court of Judicature at
Allahabad]
UTTAR PRADESH REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY
(UPRERA) & ANR. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
LARSEN AND TOUBRO LIMITED & ANR. Respondent ... which was issued by the Uttar Pradesh Real
Estate Regulatory Authority (UPRERA) to the respondents
herein. That was under the garb of assailing the said
Janme Jay, Adv.
2
For Respondent(s) Mr. Pai Amit, AOR
(For UPRERA) Ms. Komal Mundhra, Adv.
Mr. Saurabh Agrawal, Adv.
Mr. Shantanu Singh
High Court of Judicature at
Allahabad]
UTTAR PRADESH REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY
(UPRERA) & ANR. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
LARSEN AND TOUBRO LIMITED & ANR. Respondent
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT
ALLAHABAD]
UTTAR PRADESH REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY (UPRERA) &
ANR.PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
LARSEN AND TOUBRO LIMITED & ANR. RESPONDENT
High Court of Judicature at
Allahabad]
UTTAR PRADESH REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY (UPRERA) &
ANR.Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
LARSEN AND TOUBRO LIMITED & ANR. Respondent
High Court of Judicature at
Allahabad]
UTTAR PRADESH REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY (UPRERA) &
ANR.Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
LARSEN AND TOUBRO LIMITED & ANR. Respondent
High Court of Judicature at
Allahabad]
UTTAR PRADESH REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY
(UPRERA) & ANR. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
LARSEN AND TOUBRO LIMITED & ANR. Respondent
High Court Of Judicature At
Allahabad)
UTTAR PRADESH REAL ESTATE REGULATORY
AUTHORITY (UPRERA) & ANR. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
LARSEN AND TOUBRO LIMITED & ANR. Respondent
