Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

VVf§ The imsugfieé 3i§§§fT'%€§"§i cf i§sAé §;-riai7_VA£<:g-:35%"dgfiéati _Z2.§_L2GG? én CC Nséfifi

apply to such offence". 8. There--i..is7..ii;nvglotibted.:vVf_cl:a:ri'ty the head note that the offences punishment

dispute. _Ih factA,..s§gh_atrrLre .arid.'e§§§vVf%r;3r: that document is admitted vtbdiépe it had to be seer: whether" that

evidence held if misappropriation of the.,....'\'It1V_onei/ __to_Vvf'fthe:._;""'extent "of Rs.57,772==20ps

shfiea€t--.3gw§;é§ §V %3:§§used far the offances indftatfld * d) VVf::r§.;afi;..v_";3'2i;:§ses:ution examined

VVf of bail, benefit has been giVen"to, TcC.--aclci:;.§.sed*.wbo facewthe same charge. Therefore, petitioner is also enltitledv same relief

failed to do and thus it is a case of .VVf'a~i_.lure to exercise jurisdiction on the part of the learned magistrate

siisé" .i§iii:--V"i:¥ia.VVf's:3ii1ieri that the ssntsncsi**ims:sséé

VVf§;}fi»t§ 'C_aZ}§"i§'€3§1'{§.O1'1 of the accuaed tézat

date of aftaizaing nmjority or vah§:':imt'rxe "VVf.l1"(;}1 Vbefiare. attaining ma_3'ority', the period