first respondent had taken a prompt action in setting right the wrong promotion given to the second respondent on 24.02.1998 itself. But, unfortunately, the second ... first respondent. Moreover, the second respondent was given erroneous promotion only on the basis of a wrong clarification made by the Liasioning Officer
Appellate Authority in the matter of wrong sanction of incentive increment and wrong promotion given as Headmaster to Mr.S.Arulraj.
On the basis ... Hence the promotion as B.T Headmaster given is also not in order. Again, as per rules, this promotion given to Mr.S. Arulraj
senior to the petitioner and therefore, he was granted promotion.
4. A counter-affidavit has also been filed on behalf of
respondent no. 6 whereunder ... denied the benefit of promotion and
respondent no. 6 was wrongly given promotion on a vacancy for the
general category candidate, for which the petitioner
seniority list. It further reveals
that one Renu Tripathi was given wrong promotion
despite the fact that she was junior to the present
petitioner
petition bearing no.6099/2012 is pending where petitioner has challenged the promotion of private respondent. The writ petition is yet to be decided. This ... nature prayed therein. If petitioner feels that person was wrongly given promotion and challenge exists in the earlier writ petition and should be decided first
that the petitioners are
entitled for promotion on the post of Subordinate Education Service (SES)
(Primary Section), but, one junior was promoted. The decision ... opposite parties. As per this
decision, a person, who was given wrong promotion has been withdrawn
and the order for withdrawal has also been implemented
Officer, district Balaghat is being assailed vide this petition.
Vide impugned order promotion granted to the petitioner
from the post of Assistant Teacher to that ... petitioner was not within the zone of consideration and
was wrongly given the promotion.
Initially appointed as Assistant Teacher in the Tribal
Welfare Department, petitioner
Officer, district Balaghat is being assailed vide this petition.
Vide impugned order promotion granted to the petitioner
from the post of Assistant Teacher to that ... petitioner was not within the zone of consideration and
was wrongly given the promotion.
Initially appointed as Assistant Teacher in the Tribal
Welfare Department, petitioner
Officer, district Balaghat is being assailed vide this petition.
Vide impugned order promotion granted to the petitioner
from the post of Assistant Teacher to that ... petitioner was not within the zone of consideration and
was wrongly given the promotion.
Initially appointed as Assistant Teacher in the Tribal
Welfare Department, petitioner
copy of the
answer sheet and found that one question was wrongly evaluated. On pointing
out the same, the respondents have issued show cause notice ... Original Application vide Annexure A-5. The applicant has
been given a wrong promotion and as such, it is only appropriate that in her
place
