partly allowed. In place of the
direction given by the learned Single Judge to give notional
promotion to the writ petitioner, we direct that ... directly recruited
as Hindi Translator, was wrongly given promotion as
Accountant [O‐(4)]; he stands reverted and he is holding the
post of Hindi Translator
seniority list. It further reveals
that one Renu Tripathi was given wrong promotion
despite the fact that she was junior to the present
petitioner
which petitioner was
selected and recommended for promotion,
therefore, his date of promotion was
corrected as the date of subsequent
interview i.e. 07.01.2022, which ... Learned counsel for GBPIET, however,
submits that petitioner was wrongly given
promotion to the post of Professor w.e.f.
24.12.2012 by overlooking the fact
which petitioner was
selected and recommended for promotion,
therefore, his date of promotion was
corrected as the date of subsequent
interview i.e. 07.01.2022, which ... Learned counsel for GBPIET, however,
submits that petitioner was wrongly given
promotion to the post of Professor w.e.f.
24.12.2012 by overlooking the fact
which petitioner was
selected and recommended for promotion,
therefore, his date of promotion was
corrected as the date of subsequent
interview i.e. 07.01.2022, which ... Learned counsel for GBPIET, however,
submits that petitioner was wrongly given
promotion to the post of Professor w.e.f.
24.12.2012 by overlooking the fact
which petitioner was
selected and recommended for promotion,
therefore, his date of promotion was
corrected as the date of subsequent
interview i.e. 07.01.2022, which ... Learned counsel for GBPIET, however,
submits that petitioner was wrongly given
promotion to the post of Professor w.e.f.
24.12.2012 by overlooking the fact
State.
3. According to petitioner, he was wrongly given
promotion to the post of Chief Agriculture Officer in
2010 while he was not eligible
eligibility and
seniority of the petitioner, respondent no. 4 was
wrongly given promotion to the post of Lecturer
(Hindi).
Mr. A.K. Joshi, learned Addl
given selection grade and
promotion pay scale, therefore, there was no occasion for
respondent no. 3 to cancel the order, whereby such benefit
was given ... order, respondent no. 3 has held
that petitioner was wrongly given benefit of selection
grade/promotion pay scale and has also ordered for
recovery
original School, where respondent No. 5 was given
posting on promotion and that is wrongly reported and, therefore, the
appellant, who was promoted earlier than
