3% additional stamp duty
towards social security fund but it was ordered by the Collector that the
social security fund would not be chargeable ... therefore, the duty charged under Section 3-C of the Act to the extent of 3%
towards social security fund is patently erroneous and illegal
URMIBEN KANAIYALAL....Appellant(s)
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT - THROUGH THEDIRECTOR SOCIAL SECURITY &
3....Respondent(s)
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR SUNIL K SHAH, ADVOCATE for the Appellant ... 3 in LPA No.70/2012,
LPA Nos.334 and 335 of 2013.
MR BHARGAV PANDYA, AGP for Respondent No.1, 3
Theerthamalai Vaniga Valagam,
Three Road, Salem 0 636 009.
3.The Social Security Officer,
Salem Division-II,
ESI Corporation,
1/241, Kumaran Tower,
Alagapuram Post ... Theerthamalai Vaniga Valagam,
Three Road, Salem 0 636 009.
3.The Social Security Officer,
Salem Division-II,
ESI Corporation,
1/241, Kumaran Tower,
Alagapuram Post
days and Medical Leave 2 days amount of Rs.3,38,800/-, Social Security Scheme amount of Rs.30,000/-, Erode Engineering College, Perundurai Medical ... days and Medical Leave 2 days amount of Rs.3,38,800/-, Social Security Scheme amount of Rs.30,000/-, Erode Engineering College, Perundurai Medical
Petitioner(s)
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT - THROUGH THEDIRECTOR SOCIAL SECURITY &
3....Respondent(s)
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR SUNIL K SHAH, ADVOCATE for the Petitioner
Petitioner(s)
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT - THROUGH THEDIRECTOR SOCIAL SECURITY &
3....Respondent(s)
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR SUNIL K SHAH, ADVOCATE for the Petitioner
Petitioner(s)
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT - THROUGH THEDIRECTOR SOCIAL SECURITY &
3....Respondent(s)
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR SUNIL K SHAH, ADVOCATE for the Petitioner
MANSABEN RAMNALAL....Petitioner(s)
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT - THROUGH THEDIRECTOR SOCIAL SECURITY &
3....Respondent(s)
================================================================
Appearance:
MR SUNIL K SHAH, ADVOCATE for the Petitioner
Petitioner(s)
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT - THROUGH THEDIRECTOR SOCIAL SECURITY &
3....Respondent(s)
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR SUNIL K SHAH, ADVOCATE for the Petitioner
Petitioner(s)
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT - THROUGH THEDIRECTOR SOCIAL SECURITY &
3....Respondent(s)
================================================================
Appearance:
MR SUNIL K SHAH, ADVOCATE for the Petitioner
