STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF PLANNING AND PROGRAMME IMPLEMENTATION (SHRI RAM NAIK): Earlier, we had agreed that we will work up to eight ... करता हूं और अपनी बात समाप्त करता हूं।
>SHRI RAVI SITARAM NAIK ( PANAJI ): Mr. Deputy-Speaker, Sir, the hon. Minister of Finance has presented
STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF PLANNING AND PROGRAMME IMPLEMENTATION (SHRI RAM NAIK): Sir, as we have already said, this matter can be discussed ... और सब-मैरिन पर भी यहां चर्चा होनी चाहिए।
... (व्यवधान)
SHRI RAM NAIK : I understand the eagerness of the Leader of Opposition for a discussion
MINISTER OF STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS (SHRI RAM NAIK): I beg to lay on the Table a copy of the Leaders ... Clause 2 was added to the Bill.
Clause 3
SHRI RAVI SITARAM NAIK ( PANAJI ): I beg to move:
Page 2, -
omit lines
domestic LPG.
THE MINISTER OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS (SHRI RAM NAIK): As hon. Members are aware, the Finance Minister had, in his Budget speech ... political parties are requesting for roll back.… (Interruptions)
SHRI RAM NAIK : This would benefit over 6.3 crore urban and rural households using LPG for cooking
Ramdas Anant Naik vs Jacob Fernandes And Anr. on 4 August, 2005
Equivalent citations: 3(2006)BC271
Author: V.M. Kanade
Bench: V.M. Kanade ... commission which was to be shared by Ramdas Kholkar, Sadanand Naik and the complainant at the rate of Rs. 900/- per sq. mtr. The copy
Ramchandra Raghu Naik vs State Of Maharashtra on 25 February, 2005
Equivalent citations: 2005(3)MHLJ933
Author: R.M.S. Khandeparkar
Bench
Ramchandra Venkaji Naik vs Kallo Devji Deshpande on 21 June, 1915
Equivalent citations: (1915)17BOMLR630, 30IND. CAS.396, AIR 1915 BOMBAY 131
JUDGMENT
Basil Scott
Ganesh Ramachandra Naik vs Sitaram Bhoir & Others on 15 March, 2000
Equivalent citations: AIR2000BOM294, 2000(4)BOMCR250, (2000)2BOMLR86, 2001(2)MHLJ735
court below following the decision in Gana-pathi Ram Naik v. Kumta Shri Venka-taraman Dev, 1964-1 Mys LJ 172 upheld that contention ... view taken by a Division Bench of this Court in Ganapathi Ram Naik's case, requires reconsideration for the reasons stated in paragraph
Cause-title taken from Case Information System)
For Petitioner : Mr. Roop Ram Naik, Advocate
For State/Respondents : Mr. Arpit Agrawal, Panel Lawyer ... Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge
CAV Order
1. Heard Mr. Roop Ram Naik, learned counsel for the petitioner as
well as Mr. Arpit Agrawal, learned
