have and, thus, cannot exercise any inherent
jurisdiction.
11. In Adalat Prasad v. Rooplal Jindal [(2004) 7
SCC 338: 2004 SCC (Cri) 1927] a three ... upon the decision of the Hon'ble Apex
Court in Adalat Prasad vs Rooplal Jindal
and Others (Coram: 3 JJ)2, more particularly
Paragraph
have and, thus, cannot exercise any inherent
jurisdiction.
11. In Adalat Prasad v. Rooplal Jindal [(2004) 7
SCC 338: 2004 SCC (Cri) 1927] a three ... upon the decision of the Hon'ble Apex
Court in Adalat Prasad vs Rooplal Jindal
and Others (Coram: 3 JJ)2, more particularly
Paragraph
respondents in that case , relied on the judgment of Adalat Prasad vs. Ruplal Jindal , reported in (2004) 7 SCC 338 and held that the matter ... Apex Court, by relying upon the decision in the case of Adalat Prasad 's case (supra), has held that considering the nature
Adalat Prasad And Others vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. ... on 15 March, 2024
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW ... Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 284 of 2023
Applicant :- Adalat Prasad And Others
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home
Adalat Prasad vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Deptt. ... on 29 April, 2024
Author: Manish Kumar
Bench: Manish Kumar
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ... Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3855 of 2024
Petitioner :- Adalat Prasad
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Deptt. Of Revenue, Lucknow
Mukesh Kumar Kushwaha, vs Adalat Prasad, on 21 November, 2024
Author: Arun Kumar Jha
Bench: Arun Kumar Jha
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ... Mukesh Kumar Kushwaha & Ors.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
Adalat Prasad & Ors.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ramadhar Shekhar, Advocate
Adalat Prasad Dubey vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 10 July, 2024
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
WPS No. 2093 of 2024
Adalat Prasad
Adalat Prasad Dubey vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 4 April, 2024
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
WPS No. 2093 of 2024
Adalat Prasad
judicial discretion no specific provision is
required. In Adalat Prasad's case, this court considered the
said view of the court ... recall
such order. In that line of reasoning this Court in Adalat
Prasad's case held :
"Therefore, we are of the opinion that
judicial discretion no specific provision is
required. In Adalat Prasad's case, this court considered the
said view of the court ... recall
such order. In that line of reasoning this Court in Adalat
Prasad's case held :
"Therefore, we are of the opinion that
