were
'below benchmark'. It is an admitted case of the parties that these two
'below benchmark' grading were not communicated ... formalised as under:-
a) That the non-communication of the below benchmark
grading in the ACRs is violative of the principles of natural
justice
unheeded. The Respondents communicated to the Applicant the ACRs with below benchmark grading by a letter dated 04.05.2010. The Applicant made two separate representations against ... below benchmark grading in the two ACRs on 16.05.2010 and 17.05.2010. These representations were rejected by the order dated 18.08.2010 by the Ministry of Defence
eligible.The selection is by merit for which the benchmark in overall grading in the ACRs will not be below "Very Good”.
As the post ... eligible. The selection is by merit for which the benchmark in overall grading in the ACRs will not be below "Very Good”.
Recruitment Rules
eligible.The selection is by merit for which the benchmark in overall grading in the ACRs will not be below "Very Good ... eligible.The selection is by merit for which the benchmark in overall grading in the ACRs will not be below "Very Good
also
been contended in the said affidavit that since the benchmark grading prescribed by
the Government for promotion was "very good ... alongwith the other eligible CMO (OG). The Benchmark
grading prescribed by the Govt. for promotion was and is "Very Good". The
Petitioner could
instructions contained in OM dated May 14, 2009, that below
benchmark grading is required to be communicated within 15 days of
recording of the same ... stated that the plea of
Mr. Bhardwaj that, if the below benchmark grading of APARs has not
been communicated to the employee, the same shall
APAR‟) for the period between 01.04.2015 to
31.03.2016, wherein a below benchmark grading of „3.1‟ has been
awarded to the petitioner.
2. The petitioner also ... office of the Commandant.
However, the petitioner received a below benchmark grading of „3.1‟
with the remark „Average‟ for the period from
rejecting Mr. Chopra‟s representations against
the adverse remarks and below benchmark grading in the Annual
Confidential Rolls („ACRs‟) for the years 2000-„01 till ... representations of Mr. Chopra against the adverse remarks and below
benchmark grading in his ACRs
year 1998-1999 contained a below-benchmark grading, that is,
'Average', and did not meet the prescribed benchmark for the grant of
Signature ... communicated to the officer, and not the
adverse or below-benchmark grading.
6. The petitioner admittedly represented against the adverse
remarks contained
next higher post on the ground of having below benchmark
grading (BBM) for the relevant years under consideration in his ACRs. According
to the petitioner ... years 2005-06 and 2006-07 he was
considered having below benchmark gradings and therefore, he was not
considered for promotion. According to the petitioner
