Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (1.83 seconds)
Documents citing Mohd. Rizwan & Others vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic ... on 29 March, 2019

State Of U.P.Through Prin.Secy.(Basic ... vs Mohd.Rizwan And Ors. on 20 November, 2019

2) This intra-Court appeal has been filed challenging the judgment and order dated 06.03.2018 passed by learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.28222 (S/S) of 2017; Mohd. Rizwan and 103 others Vs. State of U.P. and others, whereby the learned Single Judge issued mandamus commanding the Secretary, Examination Regulatory Authority to make fresh evaluation of all the answer sheets of the candidates by deleting 14 questions as stated in paragraph Nos.85 and 86 of the order from total questions of the question papers and the Secretary, Examination Regulatory Authority was directed to declare the result on the basis of above direction, as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of one month and thereafter, the examination of the post of Assistant Teachers Recruitment Examination, 2018 shall be conducted and it was observed that it is needless to direct that till the completion of aforesaid exercise, the examination of the Assistant Teacher Recruitment Examination, 2018 be postponed for further date.
Allahabad High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 41 - Full Document

Raghvendra Pratap Singh And Ors. vs State Of U.P.Throu.Prin.Secy.(Basic ... on 6 May, 2020

(3) These Special Appeals arise out of judgment and order dated 29.3.2019 passed in Writ Petition No.1188 (SS) of 2019 and other connected matters filed by Shiksha Mitras challenging the Government Order dated 7.1.2019, by which the State Government has fixed the qualifying marks of Assistant Teacher Recruitment Examination - 2019 at 60% - 65% (for general and reserved category respectively). The facts are being narrated from Mohd. Rizwan and others v. State of U.P. and others (Writ Petition No. 1188 (SS) of 2019).
Allahabad High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 7 - Full Document

State Of U.P. And 3 Others vs Reena Singh And 74 Others on 27 May, 2020

Both these special appeals are directed against the common judgment and order dated 3.4.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge of this court in Writ-A No.713 of 2019, (Reena Singh and 74 Ors Vs. State of U.P. & 3 Ors) and other connected matters, whereby the writ petitions were allowed in terms of the judgment delivered by the learned Single Judge, Lucknow Bench of this Court in leading petition being Service Single No.1188 of 2019, (Mohd. Rizwan and Others Vs. State of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Basic Education Lko & Ors) along with other connected matters.
Allahabad High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Chhota @ Murtaza And Another vs State Of U.P. And Another on 11 April, 2023

This Criminal Appeal under Section 14-A(2) Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act has been filed questioning the correctness of the order 16.8.2022 passed by Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Muzaffar Nagar in Bail Application no. 3456 of 2022 (Rizwan and others vs. State of U.P.) in Case Crime no. 440 of 2022, under Sections 354(B), 506, 34 IPC and Section 67(A) of I.T. Act and Section 3(1)(w)(ii) of SC/ST Act, P.S. Kotwali Nagar, District Muzaffar Nagar whereby his prayer for bail has been rejected.
Allahabad High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mohd. Rizvan vs State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. ... on 10 September, 2024

"WHEREFORE, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble court may graciously be pleased to direct the instant petition under section 483 Cr.P.C/529 B.N.S.S is being filed for a direction to the Special Judge (Gangster Act), Court No. 9, District- Barabanki to decided the case no. 383/2024 U/S 16(2), 17 U.P. Gangster Act & Rule- 53 of U.P. Gangster Rules, 2021 on dated 06.08.2024 (Mohd. Rizvan and others V/S State of U.P.) which is pending before the Special Judge (Gangster Act), Court No. 9, District- Barabanki."
Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - S Lavania - Full Document
1   2 Next