citedby: 124752650

Daleshwar Gope Son Of Sri Ishwar Gope vs The State Of Bihar on 5 March, 2024

116. Further it is settled connotation of law that it is necessary to establish common object before a person can be convicted with aid of Section, 149 as has been held by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Dauwalal v. State of M.P., (2019) 4 SCC 538.

Jharkhand High Court Cites 35 - Cited by 0 - S N Prasad - Full Document

Daleshwar Gope Son Of Sri Ishwar Gope vs The State Of Bihar on 5 March, 2024

116. Further it is settled connotation of law that it is necessary to establish common object before a person can be convicted with aid of Section, 149 as has been held by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Dauwalal v. State of M.P., (2019) 4 SCC 538.

Jharkhand High Court Cites 35 - Cited by 0 - S N Prasad - Full Document

Panchal Oraon vs The State Of Jharkhand on 17 January, 2025

106. Further it is settled connotation of law that it is necessary to establish common object before a person can be 43 convicted with aid of Section149 as has been held by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Dauwalal v. State of M.P., (2019) 4 SCC 538.

Jharkhand High Court Cites 29 - Cited by 0 - S N Prasad - Full Document

Panchal Oraon vs The State Of Jharkhand on 17 January, 2025

106. Further it is settled connotation of law that it is necessary to establish common object before a person can be 43 convicted with aid of Section149 as has been held by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Dauwalal v. State of M.P., (2019) 4 SCC 538.

Jharkhand High Court Cites 29 - Cited by 0 - S N Prasad - Full Document

Panchal Oraon vs The State Of Jharkhand on 17 January, 2025

106. Further it is settled connotation of law that it is necessary to establish common object before a person can be 43 convicted with aid of Section149 as has been held by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Dauwalal v. State of M.P., (2019) 4 SCC 538.

Jharkhand High Court Cites 29 - Cited by 0 - S N Prasad - Full Document

Panchal Oraon vs The State Of Jharkhand on 17 January, 2025

106. Further it is settled connotation of law that it is necessary to establish common object before a person can be 43 convicted with aid of Section149 as has been held by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Dauwalal v. State of M.P., (2019) 4 SCC 538.

Jharkhand High Court Cites 29 - Cited by 0 - S N Prasad - Full Document

State Of Gujarat vs Thakore Hakabhai Karamshibhai on 17 April, 2026

In this regard, reliance is placed on the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Dauwalal @ Ganesh Devangan & Ors. v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2019) 4 SCC 538. Therefore, the evidence produced before the Trial Court was not sufficient to prove the case against the accused or to establish their guilt beyond reasonable doubt. After properly appreciating the evidence, the learned Trial Court rightly concluded that the prosecution case was not reliable and acquitted the accused of the charges against them.

Gujarat High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ganesh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 26 February, 2020

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - J P Gupta - Full Document

Kaushal Verma vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 6 October, 2020

Relying on the decision of this Court in Criminal Appeal Nos. 478-479 of 2019 (Dauwalal @ Ganesh Devangan & Ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh [now State of Chhattisgarh]) acquitting original Accused Nos.6,12,13 and 16, this Review Petition has been filed submitting that the Review Petitioners are similarly situated and, as such, are entitled to the same benefit.

Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ganesh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 8 October, 2020

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - V Dhagat - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results