Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.43 seconds)
Documents citing Virendra Kumar Gautam vs The State Of M.P. & Anr. Judgement Given ... on 27 August, 2013

Dhirendra Kumar Gautam vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 26 February, 2019

(DHIRENDRA KUMAR GAUTAM Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH) 1 Jabalpur, Dated : 26-02-2019 Shri A.K.Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners. Shri Sunil Verma, learned Government Advocate for the State. The petitioners have filed this petition challenging Annexure-P/12 whereby the result of examination taken pursuant to an advertisement/notification in 2014 was cancelled as the Reservation Policy was not completely followed. This notification was published on 1.9.2017 and the same is challenged by the petitioners on 12.02.2019 by this petition. In the column for mentioning the ground for delay, the petitioners have stated that they have filed this petition within a reasonable time and there is no delay in filing the present petition.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Narendra @ Virendra vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 10 March, 2022

It is submitted by the counsel for the appellant that according to the prosecution case, the appellant and another co-accused had assaulted the injured by fists and blows. The FIR was lodged by the injured himself. Later on, the deceased died on account of internal damage to his spleen. The applicant was not aware of the fact that his assault may result in rupturing his spleen and was not aware that 2 THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH CRA No.2374/2022 (NARENDRA @ VIRENDRA VS. STATE OF M.P. & ANR.) injured/deceased had enlarged spleen. He is in jail from 06/12/2021 i.e. three months. The Trial is likely to take sufficiently long time and there is no possibility of his absconding or tampering with the prosecution case.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - G S Ahluwalia - Full Document

Surendra Kumar Gautam vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 29 June, 2015

This application has been filed for restoration of W.P. No.20253/2014 which is said to have been dismissed for want of prosecution. However, on going through the original records of W.P. No.20253/2014 – Surendra Kumar Gautam Vs. State of M.P. & Others. On a perusal of order dated 5.5.2015, we find that writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as none appeared for the petitioner.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next