Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.61 seconds)

Amjad Khan vs Rani Durgavati Vishwavidyalaya ... on 14 November, 2018

It is, however, observed that the Ordinance in question was promulgated and brought into force by the authorities in the year 2008-09 and thereafter, in view of the orders passed by this Court in cases of Ankit Shrivastava (supra) and Ku. Urmila Maravi (supra), the University has assessed the students by determining their aggregate marks on yearly basis. It is an admitted fact that even in the case of the petitioner, the said system was adopted for all previous years.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Amit Nougariya vs Rani Durgawati Vishwavidyalaya on 4 December, 2018

It is, however, observed that the Ordinance in question was promulgated and brought into force by the authorities in the year 2008-09 and thereafter, in view of the orders passed by this Court in cases of Ankit Shrivastava (supra) and Ku. Urmila Maravi (supra), the University has assessed the students by determining their aggregate marks on yearly basis. It is an admitted fact that even in the case of the petitioner, the said system was adopted for all previous years.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Amit Nougariya vs Rani Durgawati Vishwavidyalaya on 4 December, 2018

It is, however, observed that the Ordinance in question was promulgated and brought into force by the authorities in the year 2008-09 and thereafter, in view of the orders passed by this Court in cases of Ankit Shrivastava (supra) and Ku. Urmila Maravi (supra), the University has assessed the students by determining their aggregate marks on yearly basis. It is an admitted fact that even in the case of the petitioner, the said system was adopted for all previous years.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1