Learned counsel for the applicant submits that
chargesheet has since been filed in the matter. He has read
out the 164 Cr.PC statements of prosecutrix as per which the
prosecutrix had herself stated that she had left her house on
her own and she used to like the applicant and wanted to
marry him and she asked the applicant to take her away,
2
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH AT INDORE
MISC. CRIMINAL CASE NO.26753 OF 2021
(Sunil Ahirwar vs State of Madhya Pradesh)
otherwise she would commit suicide. Later on, she left by bus
and met the applicant who took her to a room where they made
physical relations with each other with her consent for once
only. The applicant is in jail since 24.03.2021 and the
conclusion of trial would take considerably long time. With
these submissions, bail has been sought.
Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
The Court by order dated 29.06.2021 passed in M.Cr.C.
No.31852/2021, while rejecting the fourth bail application had found
that the third bail application was filed along-with the affidavits of
witnesses which were obtained after the rejection of second bail
application and by those affidavits, the witnesses had given a clean
2
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
MCRC No. 59505/2021
(SUNIL AHIRWAR Vs STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH)
chit to the applicant. Thus, considering that the applicant is actively
involved in pressurizing and winning over the witnesses and has also
succeeded in obtaining the affidavits of witnesses, contrary to the
allegations which were made by them in the statements under Section
161 of Cr.P.C, the third bail application of applicant was rejected.
Similarly, the fifth bail application was rejected by order dated
21.09.2021 passed in M.Cr.C. No.46631/2021.